What's new

Study: Cannabis Users Stay Motivated. Lazy Stoner Myth Debunked

Sweatloaf

Well-known member
Study: Cannabis Users Stay Motivated. Lazy Stoner Myth Debunked


From the link:

Summary: A new study challenges the stereotype that chronic cannabis users are lazy and unmotivated. The research surveyed 260 frequent users and found no significant drop in their motivation or effort levels while high compared to when sober.

The study also observed enhanced positive emotions and a slight dip in self-regulation among users when high. This nuanced approach aims to provide a more balanced view of the effects of regular cannabis use on daily life.

Three Key Facts:​

  1. No Impact on Motivation: Chronic cannabis users showed the same willingness to exert effort on tasks while high as when they were not.
  2. Emotional and Self-Regulation Effects: While cannabis use boosted positive emotions like awe and gratitude, it also led to decreased self-regulation, making users more impulsive and less orderly.
  3. No Weed Hangover: The research found no evidence of a decline in emotional or motivational function the day after cannabis use, debunking the idea of a “weed hangover.”
Source: University of Toronto
 

blondie

Well-known member
Anyone actually read that entire link? Lots to read and I’m feeling kinda lazy after hitting Ka5h... :smoker:
 

bigsur51

On a mailtrain.
Premium user
Veteran
420club
if one is feeling kinda lazy now , there is a high probability one would feel kinda lazy without cannabis
 

xtsho

Well-known member
The methodology used for the study is questionable.

Extremely small sample size:

"We queried chronic users (N = 260) 5 times per day over 7 days (3,701 observations)"

"In total, our final sample contains 260 participants who completed both the baseline questionnaire and at least one experience sampling survey, resulting in a sample of n = 3,701 surveys"


Questionable participants:

"Participants were recruited from Reddit"
 

bigsur51

On a mailtrain.
Premium user
Veteran
420club
The methodology used for the study is questionable.

Extremely small sample size:

"We queried chronic users (N = 260) 5 times per day over 7 days (3,701 observations)"

"In total, our final sample contains 260 participants who completed both the baseline questionnaire and at least one experience sampling survey, resulting in a sample of n = 3,701 surveys"


Questionable participants:

"Participants were recruited from Reddit"


maybe they should study the population of Jamaica or at least Ocho Rios

how about the humans who live near the Bekka Valley?..

meanwhile , this doctor did an actual bonafide scientific study


 
Top