how bout this breaking news:
http://www.coloradomedicalmarijuanapatient.com/images/issues/janes.pdf
http://www.coloradomedicalmarijuanapatient.com/images/issues/janes.pdf
A marijuana ponzi scheme? wtf?how bout this breaking news:
http://www.coloradomedicalmarijuanapatient.com/images/issues/janes.pdf
Well I found the word "enclosed" in the CRS. Funny the 'Task Force' didn't think to look in the Criminal Code section as it pertains to Real Property.
CRS 18-4-503 : Second degree criminal trespass
(1) A person commits the crime of second degree criminal trespass if such person:
(a) Unlawfully enters or remains in or upon the premises of another which are enclosed in a manner designed to exclude intruders or are fenced; or
(b) Knowingly and unlawfully enters or remains in or upon the common areas of a hotel, motel, condominium, or apartment building; or
(c) Knowingly and unlawfully enters or remains in a motor vehicle of another.
18-4-504. Third degree criminal trespass
(1) A person commits the crime of third degree criminal trespass if such person unlawfully enters or remains in or upon premises of another.
(2) Third degree criminal trespass is a class 1 petty offense, but:
(a) It is a class 3 misdemeanor if the premises have been classified by the county assessor for the county in which the land is situated as agricultural land pursuant to section 39-1-102 (1.6), C.R.S.; and
(b) It is a class 5 felony if the person trespasses on premises so classified as agricultural land with the intent to commit a felony thereon.
http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/colorado/
So fuck'em! They scoured the CRS to find the word 'enclosed' in the best light possible for them. But it doesn't have a peg leg to stand on when the definition is applied in the context of Real Property.
They will throw out obscure statues and verdicts to scare you. Knowing full well that you are 'too busy' to do your 'due diligence' as a citizen in a Democracy (Representative Republic) and question their stats/sources/motives...
Just please people, do a little more reading before you pull a HawkHazard.
when 64 took effect all I did was reduce my plant count
and bought bigger smart pots and threw a dead bolt on my room
as far as I know I am legal
Tis wonderful, and I don't know why people think as an industry member legalization doesn't benefit me as much as the person who wants to grow in his backyard.
Countless people don't want to grow in their backyards, many have tried and failed, home brew beer is almost always better in quality yet people continue to buy everything from budweiser to stella, suddenly my market includes all those "beer drinkers", how is that not awesome for me?
Home growers will be sharing their herbs with their friends, awesome! Those home growers will run out that much sooner and need to come into the shop to tide themselves over between harvests
Very, very smart. It means that Colorado law enforcement can't touch you for growing. If you're engaged in it as a commercial venture, the risks don't change on that.
Technically, a couple could have 6 flowering plants and 6 non-flowering mother plants of different varieties.
Government by, of, and for, attorneys.
Much as it always was.
i think the stigma of cannabis is going to make MANY MORE people grow than ever have, because they have been forbidden to do so for SO MANY GENERATIONS.
smurph; im not saying that the industry of pot shops will be undermined by home growers, on the contrary, i believe increased regulations will make it more difficult for homegrowers (HOPE I'm wrong) & that over time potshops will get better, cream will naturally rise to the top; the shitty ones will close, the crooked ones will get busted by mmed or the feds, also tourism dollars are gonna keep potshops in biz along with peeps who can't or don't want to grow.
I look forward to the unfolding of the cannabis industry in Colorado, I'm sure there will be plenty of slices of pie for growers in different situations as time goes on. *hope i don't come off sounding "anti dispensary" or like im hoping for anyone to be regulated out of the market at all... I think as it is now anyone who wants to grow can and should, and hopefully over time that will be a trend in the future.
Alcohol doesn't have this "forbidden fruit syndrome" like cannabis does. check it - first time in GENERaTIONS that we can grow our own herb legally, even in 6 plant quantities that's an amazing freedom that's just NOW been granted,
on the contrary
alcohol is inborn in our culture. the beer industry is much more established (even with the whole micro-brew thing going on now) than the "cannabis industry" could hope to be at the moment, at least.
during alcohol prohibition only manufacture, distribution, trafficking and were prosecuted, not simple possession, like the guy holding a drink (spliff).
cannabis prohibition has always been much more hardcore than the prohibition of alcohol ever was (temporarily).
It's been a little odd for me, coming back to MJ after many years of abstinence. One of the strangest things about it is that younger smokers have often never had the pleasure of smoking really good seeded pot. I always thought that it had a more complex high, better tawny flavor & smoother smoke than sinsemilla. It's where traditional hash comes from, after all...
We'll have to agree, to disagree on that one.
Also, plenty of hash farmers will slash males, eats into their hashish production. I'm sure you'd notice the yield difference on an acre by acre scale. Kinda like some grow the Chron, and others pump out bricks.
We'll have to agree, to disagree on that one.
Also, plenty of hash farmers will slash males, eats into their hashish production. I'm sure you'd notice the yield difference on an acre by acre scale. Kinda like some grow the Chron, and others pump out bricks.
MJ abstinence??? WTF??? A64 is a step in the right direction... Veteran Growers will always have the edge. Cheeba Libre!!!!