Which setup would yield better?

[icdog]

5 tables perpetual flowering
4 ft x 4 ft each table
On top of the screen scrog
1st table 1 - 400w digital
2nd - 5th table 1 - 600w digital
A new table is entered at 12 days starting with the 400w.
So each table is spaced 12 days adding up to 60 days for the flower cycle.
5 plants per table
No CO2
Yield per table - approx. 500 - 600g dry

or

3 tables perpetual flowering
4 ft x 4 ft each table ( can be changed to 5x5 or 3x5. etc )
1st table - 600w digital
2nd table - 1 600w digital and 1 400w digital ( or 1 1000w magnetic )
3rd table - 2 600w digitals
Each table spaced at 18 - 20 days.
5 plants per table

The watts is the same. Would more watts over a table be better to compensate for less tables?
Do you guys think the yield would improve, stay the same or go down?

Thanks for any comments

 

[icdog]

No one?

 

[Guest]

C'mon man that frickin hurts the brain

 

[sugabear_II]

more tables would yield more - but more work and more risk if you're in a state where plant #s determine sentence.

 

[icdog]

C'mon man that frickin hurts the brain

How do u think I feel

 

[Gangabiss]

I dunno man...just go with whichever is the cheapest and easiest to maintain?