What is the highest tested thc level you've seen?

[Tudo]

I have a few in the 26-30% range.

 

[angelgoob]

what's the name. double dutch? witchy poo?

wonder what the name is I am thinking of. Warlock.

Yes, warlock! Somewhere close to 30, but this was tested a long time ago it has not improved since I guess. It lists now as 14-20%.

 

[weedaholic721]

It's hard as labs suck really bad most places. I have seen flower test at 38% THCA here in Colorado. Chemmy Jones produced by In the Flow. Co. It definately was the best bud I have had in this state, however. Funky dankness.

 

[Aota1]

35% total cannabinoids. 31% thc on a batch of Mount Hood Magic (nl5 x durban) durban leaning pheno. Previous rounds were 28% and 30%.

 

[Mrs.Babba]

Our gg4 tested at 27.3 ....saw some 30 but that was the highest I saw at the Emerald Cup

 

[who dat is]

I've only ever had a couple of outdoor plants ever be tested and I think the max on one was just over 20% THC

 

[Cannavore]

ADub 33+% dont remember exactly

 

[mlmkvr]

I've had Bruce Banner that tested over 30% and was not actually that impressed by it. Rated higher than anything else I've gotten at the dispensary, but not at all one of my favourites.

 

[huligun]

Someone say to me in another thread that moisture content can skew the results of a test significantly since the values of THC are in ratio to weight of the other. I would think that if standardized testing is to become a reality it would have to consider moisture content.

Or, because of the amazing computers we have today we could set a baseline moisture content as the normal. Then when you test, you calculate the THC to be adjusted to the baseline moisture content.

I sometimes think there is something other than just THC that makes a smokes enjoyable. I have seen some amazing numbers on buds bought in Seattle rec stores and not so amazing numbers, and I have gotten pretty high of less than amazing numbers. The only explanation would have to be another factor othan than THC coming into play. I have seen others, like DJ Short say such thing.

I have seen 27.something percent I remember. Not sure what it was tho. Blinded by the high number

 

[bionicchronic]

im

 

[bionicchronic]

sorry i accidentally just posted "im" i meant to say: im running some gorilla bubble which is gg#4 x (gg#4 x sour bubble) by tony greens tourtured beans which just tested at 29.9%

 

[Aota1]

Terpenes play a big roll in effect / strength. A high testing flower is one indicator but the exact number isn't reliable. Things like calibration, the actual flower tested (in oregon it's around 3-4 grams tested for a batch). That's not a sure bet. Then factor in the wide array of different reasons herb can be stronger in certain ways according to each person's own chemistry. But I do think a higher thc% via lab test is a telling indicator.

 

[PDX Dopesmoker]

This is the best result I've seen from a lab report on flower. I have doubts about how accurate it was, but the bud was potent for sure.

 

[Floridian]

Used to be the one in my blood test.Ive seen better days

 

[Chimera]

This is the best result I've seen from a lab report on flower. I have doubts about how accurate it was, but the bud was potent for sure.
View Image

Not down talking the flower, but there is about a zero chance of a plant having 35% total cannabinoids. That was would be a re-prep for sure, I have serious doubt of the validity of this result and would certainly be ring testing this lab if it were in my market.

Beware folks, there is more to a lab than simply a number on the lab report.

 

[mean mr.mustard]

Two cases of Twinkies and a Totino's Party Pizza.

Sour Bubble.

 

[mr.brunch]

Think I would rather smoke the 3-4 grams and judge the high myself rather than send it off to a lab. It's not all about numbers, after all... kind of takes away the magic a little.