I doubt there will be a Christmas card exchange.Not trying to butt in, (okay maybe a little bit) but having read some of the back and forth between you guys, it's possible both of you have a point. No disrespect intended to either of you.
If you asked him not to reveal information and he did, he probably shouldn't have done so.
Although, if you publish the information you didn't want revealed on a different site that you refer people to from here, it's not unreasonable to think his revealing the same info. which you yourself also reveal is not too much of a big deal.
It's not up to me to make you guys agree to disagree, but if you did that might be cool. Alternatively, if you go on with the back and forth for a few more pages, I'm gonna need some more popcorn.
View attachment 19104816
I doubt there will be a Christmas card exchange.
Those 2 boobs have hairy nipples.
self taught 'scientists'are usually referred to as , 'charlatans '
I doubt there will be a Christmas card exchange.
Those 2 boobs have hairy nipples.
During the discussion, I made very clear that I was not trying to support the trans trend that is taking place. I also made clear that I was not arguing with you. I was only attempting to illustrate that these people (intersex) could be caught up in a broadscale law prohibiting some surgeries and pharmaceuticals. I offered a scientific paper and quotes showing that this is not as simple as you stated to deal with, because female/male hormonal tissues can be intricately intertwined, evading obvious detection. These, therefore show at puberty with such things as breast development in boys and unusual body hair, deep voice and unusual sex organ development in girls.I perfectly understand that you were trying to make an argument for trans rights over a condition so rare , it’s considered the rarest sexual disorder on earth. 1 :100,000 in live births. 500 reported cases globally.
I think modest mustard took another break from icmag. No worries though. He'll be back in a week or two more vicious than ever before
During the discussion, I made very clear that I was not trying to support the trans trend that is taking place. I also made clear that I was not arguing with you. I was only attempting to illustrate that these people (intersex) could be caught up in a broadscale law prohibiting some surgeries and pharmaceuticals. I offered a scientific paper and quotes showing that this is not as simple as you stated to deal with, because female/male hormonal tissues can be intricately intertwined, evading obvious detection. These, therefore show at puberty with such things as breast development in boys and unusual body hair, deep voice and unusual sex organ development in girls.
If you had even glanced through the paper (using your best reading skills) you might have determined what I was talking about. I also encouraged you to realize that the incidence of this is higher than you maintained. Hiddenjems got it. Perhaps you could go back and read.
"Overall, ovotesticular DSD is a rare form of DSD, with an estimated incidence of <1/20,000 individuals, representing <5% of all DSD cases."
I stated that for these individuals, they may require a range of pre and post surgical pharmaceuticals which may include hormone blockers and replacers. Mostly, theoretically this would occur around puberty in line with what I stated. Stop using strawman statements please.He’s saying that these folks should have the right to puberty blockers at a young age. My argument was these folks could get correction surgery and would not need hormone blockers.
During the discussion, I made very clear that I was not trying to support the trans trend that is taking place. I also made clear that I was not arguing with you. I was only attempting to illustrate that these people (intersex) could be caught up in a broadscale law prohibiting some surgeries and pharmaceuticals. I offered a scientific paper and quotes showing that this is not as simple as you stated to deal with, because female/male hormonal tissues can be intricately intertwined, evading obvious detection. These, therefore show at puberty with such things as breast development in boys and unusual body hair, deep voice and unusual sex organ development in girls.
If you had even glanced through the paper (using your best reading skills) you might have determined what I was talking about. I also encouraged you to realize that the incidence of this is higher than you maintained. Hiddenjems got it. Perhaps you could go back and read.
"Overall, ovotesticular DSD is a rare form of DSD, with an estimated incidence of <1/20,000 individuals, representing <5% of all DSD cases."
I stated that for these individuals, they may require a range of pre and post surgical pharmaceuticals which may include hormone blockers and replacers. Mostly, theoretically this would occur around puberty in line with what I stated. Stop using strawman statements please.
This particular group makes no noise.wow... for such a small group they certainly makes a lot of noise
I did not state that they would. I stated that some may pre-surgery. It is not as simple as your attempt to portray.If these folks had correction surgery, why would they need hormone blockers ? I asked you this before
This particular group makes no noise.
I did not state that they would. I stated that some may pre-surgery. It is not as simple as your attempt to portray.
if microbean did a real degree , masters , phd and could write prescriptions , he would make Harold Shipman look small fry in comparison
praise jah he is not qualified
I did not state that they would. I stated that some may pre-surgery. It is not as simple as your attempt to portray.