It would be even more interesting if:This is interesting:
https://www.icmag.com/ic/showthread.php?t=272162
A) The results were unambiguous (e.g. side-by-side, opinions)
B) The (active) ingredients were known
They claim that a PhD scientist (hey, you can 'rent' my PhD too ROFL) helped them develop it which leads people to believe that there's a rational explanation, a distinct mode of action, involved.
Question is, which one?
- Nutrient sensing: I judge that highly unlikely as it's an additive to a full feeding regime. Besides, the 'severe' reactions of a plant aren't the result of excess rather than deficiency.
- Hormones: Do they count as nutrient when given with the fertiliser? Other signalling molecules and second messengers as those below?
- Jasmonic acid signalling (which can be triggered by adding 'nutrients') would be one possibility and hence also salicylic acid cause they are mutually antagonistic in many regards.
- Sugar signalling: But how? Which sugars? I have a fair idea of what seems to work (anecdotal 'evidence') in young plants but beyond that...
- Nitric oxide might do something, or rather NO does do a lot of things. But can we exploit it to affect terpene production and what's the best way to do so. Again, I have only anecdotal 'evidence' (which is so anecdotal that sharing it would be negligence).
- Hydrogen peroxide is another signalling molecule involved in several cross-talks. People use it broadly for a lot of things but from what I've seen, 'germination' it the only scientifically funded application. Could it be used for more? I do not know.
Anything else that comes to mind?