You sure assume alot, like you, I am NOT a geneticist (neither of us are science experts with a string of alphabet soup behind our names), but I do know this--the more I read about genetics, I realize the less I know (as there is an abundant amount of knowledge, both good and bad).
As to your misstatement: "For a person with no experience with terpenes or Cannabis analysis to presume that they can smell the differences and understand the difference from smelling is maybe ridiculous. I understand that anyone could smell the difference but to think you know what the difference is and that their are new terpenes not found in the same plant before is a big jump."
For a smart guy I am bit surprised/disappointed in your words--you don't know me. I am a 61 year old retired professional that has enjoyed weed since the age of 12, a true wine aficionado and Certified Sommelier http://www.mastersommeliers.org/Default.aspx who, since 1985 have taught wine education seminars...and then---for you to suggest I lack the ability to "smell the differences and understand the differences" is...using your words, is "a big jump". BTW, a tool I used at these seminars was Ann Noble's Wine Aroma Wheel http://winearomawheel.com/, displayed below:
View Image
Let's just say--I am not your average dope smoker/cultivator who happens to also have a great nose for detecting nuances in aromas. If you can accurately (6 out of 10 times) identify the varietal and vintage of wine in a "blind tasting"...then you are a better man than I am. It took years of practice/experience for me to achieve this feat. Yep....line up 10 glasses of wine from different bottles (blind tasting) and over half the time I will correctly identify the varietal (zinfandel, cabernet, petite sirah, etc) and vintage (year harvested).
Secondly, your statement "I understand that you think extended flowering for 40 days created new terpenes not found before..." is not an accurate--as I submit (please reread my earlier posts) that nothing "new" is created; rather flowering the extra 40 days "expanded" the existing terpene (so let me repeat--NOTHING NEW WAS CREATED).
Finally if terpene profiles of the same plant were tested at 10 day intervals (starting day 30 of flower and continued to way past normal harvest (say 90 days)...do you think the 7 terpene profiles generated would be "identical"? Of course not. IMHO, terpenes not detected in the earlier tests but show up on the later tests are not "new"...but are "expansions" of existing terpene compounds. Again, NOTHING NEW IS CREATED.
And yes, I use tests to support my theories and validate my suspicions. But the real test is what the collective prefers and they like the tweaks I did about 6 months ago: targeted controlled water deficit (aka abiotic stress). How much do they like it...oh about $300 per unit increase over the "unstressed weed".
FYI, if you don't know it was me that introduced the Cannabis community to the idea that terpenes in Cannabis could modify and make THC stronger. This was with real tests with double blind vaped 25mg pure THC spiked with a single terpene. A 100 question erganoleptic survey before and after the single test in one day, we tested the top 10 terpenes and the top ten Cannabinoids all pure.
That is a pretty real test, it took a dozen volunteers more then month to finish.
As to if you have much experience with Cannabis analysis I really have no idea I just presumed that you did not. Being a wine sommelier, and is that a Certified sommelier? Not a Master or Advanced? May well help you to understand Cannabis, maybe a bit. Sommeliers need skills in choosing cigars that go with a meals and the wines or spirits, Cannabis experts do not. I have several friends that are sommeliers in the Bay Area, one is an Advanced Sommelier, he was studying for taking his test for Master and had a stroke, now he has stopped drinking. And while being a sommelier they have smoked Cannabis for most of their life, yet they do not understand Cannabis like I do, not even close. They do make over $100,000 a year to advise others which bottle to enjoy with their meals, they also say that many of the nouveau riche just want the most expensive wine to impress everyone around them.
I have spent the last 30 years working with Cannabis terpenes and Cannabis breeding for Cannabinoids and terpenes, that is what I do for a living. I don't drink, I don't smoke tobacco.
Yet that said, I could not do what you seemed to be saying you did.
I also have been told I have a super nose, a level of ability to smell the same smells or very slight differences in Cannabis like sister plants of the same variety from seed. To be honest I have never met anyone that has a sense of Cannabis smells anything like me, or very few.
But I do not know you, anything is possible.
I really do not know what you mean, either you can smell the differences and know what they are or you can't list the differences, by profile and %'s and each terpene? I can't, I could make guesses that there is more of a given terpene, and maybe be right sometimes.
The variability in smells from just slight variations in the profiles, just a little more of one and less of another is going to maybe change the smell completely and no way to guess what did it. Alterations of the profile amounts, or new compounds, testing is the only way to know.
Expansions of existing terpenes is an odd term for me to understand that there are no new terpenes what exactly is an expansion of a terpene? Are you referring to the alterations in the terpene profile so that the same terpenes are present, but in different %'s? I just did not understand I guess.
As for the wine aroma wheel some is relevant for Cannabis most is not. Where is your wheel for Cannabis aroma? I have seen several other posts of aroma wheels made just for Cannabis.
I really am not trying to diss you, but I do understand Cannabis terpenes, far better then most if not almost all that post here, one or two may teach me new things, to which I am thankful. I look forward to others knowing much more then me, so I can learn new info from them.
"Finally if terpene profiles of the same plant were tested at 10 day intervals (starting day 30 of flower and continued to way past normal harvest (say 90 days)...do you think the 7 terpene profiles generated would be "identical"? Of course not. IMHO, terpenes not detected in the earlier tests but show up on the later tests are not "new"...but are "expansions" of existing terpene compounds. Again, NOTHING NEW IS CREATED."
I have done thousands of tests for terpenes and yes we can find all the same terpenes in varying amounts week 4 to week 12 no new ones just varying amounts of the same terpenes, only the profile %'s changes.
Almost same with the Cannabinoids what happens with time is the %'s increase but with Cannabinoids not really even the ratios alter, they are pretty constant from seedlings to flowered, just more of them in the same ratios in flowered plants.
-SamS
Last edited: