Bubbleblower
Member
Stop it now... your'e just making a fool of yourself. Do you know anything about what you're copy/pasting????
Worst of all he ruins every single interesting thread.
Stop it now... your'e just making a fool of yourself. Do you know anything about what you're copy/pasting????
only been testing with the cheap sensing equipment i shipped with. but i'd definitely say the nutrients used in whatever ratios effect the final product.I had a thought pass through my cranium earlier and it made me wonder...
Do cannabis terpin profiles change with changes in nutrients used to grow the plants?
That's the point I wonder about: What I've seen so far is that it works in theory but the applicability for a specific sample has to be shown first and the way you put it, he hasn't tested cannabis either.
Thanks for elaborating!
if terpene production is influenced by... genetics and enviroment.
then nutrients will effect terpene production. then predators will influence terpene production.
what are specific variables in an enviroment that can cause higher linalool levels or myrcene levels?
would introducing different natural pest predators produce less pungent varieties?
follow me on this one... if scent is viewed like sound then what are higher note scents and lower note scents. Even better, ultra violet scents or sub harmonic scents. Meaning, scents we can't pick up, but other creatures and instruments may pick up (carbon monoxide meters).
great read everybody!
Honestly, that epigenetic thing is, at least for the time being, as useful for a grower as a radio telescope in his bedroom
if terpene production is influenced by... genetics and enviroment.
then nutrients will effect terpene production. then predators will influence terpene production.
what are specific variables in an enviroment that can cause higher linalool levels or myrcene levels?!
follow me on this one... if scent is viewed like sound then what are higher note scents and lower note scents. Even better, ultra violet scents or sub harmonic scents.
So, explain to us how that could possibly be utilised outside of a research lab? How is epigenetics practical? What can a gardener learn from it, how can he verify it, and how change it to his will? I'd appreciate you elaborating on the subject.Absolutely nothing is more usefull and important.
...
I am not sure but I suspect only the profile is altered, not new or different terpenes with different nutrients or environments, just different %'s in the profile.
-SamS
That's nonsense that UPLC-MS is the best method for terps, we've run a fully validated protocol with spike recovery using standards and GC-FID is the method. And we do have UPLC and MS, but MS is not needed unless you are trying to identify compounds for which you don't have a standard. Which method do you use in your laboratory OO, do you use UPLC-MS? Or are you simply speaking generalities?
As far as genes regulating terps, it's true that genes control the terpene finger print (overall profile), but specific terps fluctuate to a degree depending on epigenetic factors.
Even on a single table, where all plants are fed the same nutrients, there is some variation of levels of specific terps, whereas other terps are more stable.
You can't gain these results from a few tests, the true story comes out when you test batches of the same flowers grown in standardized conditions, time and time again, and start to compare results of the same cultivars between runs. Overall plants will retain the same fingerprint, but do show some variation between the relative components.
It's more about environment and consistent conditions- light exposure and intensity is just a single factor. Also running a single sample of bud from a crop is not really indicative of the average of the flowers across the whole crop. Testing can be manipulated if a sound sampling protocol and validated methodology is not used, so beware of this when interpreting single results from a lab... there is much more to the story.
-Chimera
i have some ideas on it. but you're not gonna listen cuz my leaves aren't pretty.