What's new
  • ICMag with help from Phlizon, Landrace Warden and The Vault is running a NEW contest for Christmas! You can check it here. Prizes are: full spectrum led light, seeds & forum premium access. Come join in!

Still the same.

White Beard

Active member
One BIG big problem with the article: the author can’t (or just doesn’t) differentiate between Stalin-era Lamarck and the Enlightenment’s Linnaeus.

Small but serious: poor research
 

h.h.

Active member
Veteran
I find difference effects with the degree of ripeness.
I've just been rather doubting the whole sativa/ indica thing. Especially the way its being pushed at the dispensaries.
Any variety will energize you only if you energize yourself.
The same for couch lock.
 

Rico Swazi

Active member
from 2013, has it become a part of the nomenclature ?(specifically the spp. indica, sativa ssp. sativa, Cannabis indica ssp. afghanica part )

A modern taxonomic model for Cannabis proposed by Robert Clarke and Mark Merlin is as follows:

  • Single "Putative Ancestor (PA)"
    • A proto-sativa "Putative Hemp Ancestor (PHA)"
      • Narrow leaf hemp ancestor
        • Narrow leaf hemp cultivars - Cannabis sativa ssp. sativa
    • proto-indica "Putative Drug Ancestor (PDA)"
      • Narrow leaf drug ancestor
        • Narrow leaf drug cultivars - Cannabis indica ssp. indica
        • Broad leaf hemp cultivars - Cannabis indica ssp. chinensis
      • Broad leaf drug ancestor
        • Broad leaf drug cultivars - Cannabis indica ssp. afghanica
https://www.ocerc.org/history-of-cannabis-taxonomy.html

There is another problem with naming the plant I found

most people, around me, are clueless that cbd comes from cannabis or to use the US gov't slang term, 'marijuana'
'Cannabis IS marijuana' I find myself saying over and over

I tell them it is the same plant, different cultivars.
its the glazed look in their eyes that drives me crazy.
 
Top