.... Do I need to go on?
Assuming president Paul managed to lead (congressional) repeal of the Patriot Act, would he also end military commissions for non-sanctioned, foreign terrorists?
.... Do I need to go on?
Assuming president Paul managed to lead (congressional) repeal of the Patriot Act, would he also end military commissions for non-sanctioned, foreign terrorists?
If we do not vote for ron paul we are idiots.. thats all there is too it. He is the only guy standing up for us. He is the least selfish person up there and I believe he is trying to make this a better place for all of us.
I just dont see how some people cannot vote for the only guy that wants to end the wars, stop ndaa and sopa, allow you to opt of of SS, allow you to use money based off of gold, end the patriot act, END THE WAR ON DRUGS, etc.... Do I need to go on? this guy is standing up for your rights and people are worried about abortion, his religious beliefs, and saying his foreign and economic policies are INSANE.
Honestly, if he were to benefit corporations so much, dont you think the corporations would be supporting him and not the other candidates?
Its time to stop pointing out everything little fucking detail that is wrong about him and see the guy for who he is and what he stands for. There is no other politician up there that has an honest bone in their body.
Lets make some god damn changes.. please? I am only 25 and I would love to see some real freedom sometime in my life and I would really like to see my kids have some sort of decent life as well.
Ok, You worry about cat houses and a vague example that you admit yourself applies to some counties in Vegas.
I'll worry about your freedom and mine, while I defend our one candidate that "HONORS THE CONSTITUTION"
Pretty much everything itisme posts is either pulled out of his ass, or requoted shit he doesn't even understand from some other website, salted with a bunch of typos and grammatical errors to make it even more incoherent.
Though it is somewhat entertaining seeing him sputter and froth at the mouth...
Ok, You worry about cat houses and a vague example that you admit yourself applies to some counties in Vegas.
I'll worry about your freedom and mine, while I defend our one candidate that "HONORS THE CONSTITUTION"
i already gave up on that when he posted bullshit about cameras being made illegal. of course he couldn't back that up...
In some states it is illegal to shoot footage with a camera/camcorder/telephone camers/etc, of a police officer. We had an incident here last year where a pos cop beat up a guy who was recording him during the course of an arrest. Footage got on tv the whole nine yards. 2 to 3 weeks ago that pos cop was fired for what he did. During all the reporting of the incident when it happened the reporter and the sheriff of Clark County did state that some states it was a law violation to record an officer at any time but not here. Those states did that because their police unions/departments did not want to have to have video footage pop up in court while defending their officers while being sued for police violence that has happened on some occasions. These are the same police unions by the way that fight tooth and nail to keep cops from taking routine drug test. Don't want to have proof of dirty cops on the job now do we?
i'm not arguing that point... although that's bullshit too...
itisme said states were making cameras illegal...
what kind of a corporation would waste their money on someone that they know is not electable?
itisme...instead of making me like ron paul (which is probably your goal as a ron paul supporter), you make me hate ron paul even more than i already do.
In some states it is illegal to shoot footage with a camera/camcorder/telephone camers/etc, of a police officer