I remember history classes and learning about the Articles of Confederation, how the states had too many litigants for the dockets to hear. Litigants who were actually heard enjoyed too few laws to render judgement (and) interstate litigation had no legal basis, rendering an unmanageable interstate commerce system.
One area where all this chaos shined was the ultimate system of winners vs losers. Few, big winners from multiple, small losers
Neither the Constitution nor the AOC established the power for interstate arbitration. Supporters who advocate state courts to remedy trade disputes aren't considering how this attempt overwhelmed the states justice system (with merely intrastate disputes.)
If similar, contemporary interpretations of the commerce clause aren't applied, we'll repeat the same interstate commerce disputes we saw for 11 long years.
The truly rich can buy states far easier than federal government. Be careful what you wish for. If history is any indicator, we'll wind up with the same dysfunctions that typically mass-transfer common wealth to the top.
One area where all this chaos shined was the ultimate system of winners vs losers. Few, big winners from multiple, small losers
Neither the Constitution nor the AOC established the power for interstate arbitration. Supporters who advocate state courts to remedy trade disputes aren't considering how this attempt overwhelmed the states justice system (with merely intrastate disputes.)
If similar, contemporary interpretations of the commerce clause aren't applied, we'll repeat the same interstate commerce disputes we saw for 11 long years.
The truly rich can buy states far easier than federal government. Be careful what you wish for. If history is any indicator, we'll wind up with the same dysfunctions that typically mass-transfer common wealth to the top.