What's new
  • ICMag with help from Landrace Warden and The Vault is running a NEW contest in November! You can check it here. Prizes are seeds & forum premium access. Come join in!

Red-Eye Jedi smoke report

203708-10-redeye-jedi01.jpg


203708-10-redeye-jedi03.jpg


203708-10-redeye-jedi02.jpg



This was the recommended sativa at the Hortipharm, I was told it was a pure sativa - apparently that is slang these days for unmanicured. I found the amount of trim on it when I purchased it to be unacceptable, there was a large amount of leaf I had to remove before being able to take fair pics of the nugs.

I enjoyed the smells of this bud when it was freshly ground, wish it would of come out in the flavor a bit more but it is what it is. Flavor was more bland and earthy like an outdoor strain would have to it.

Fair up high to it, nothing to write home about and far from a "pure sativa". It has a clean high to it that would do the trick during the day for a light user but I feel a medical user would need something a bit stronger than this gear.

Overall smokeability wasn't too bad, after cleaning up the bonus leaf it burned clean and didn't have much irritation in the smoke.
 
and the SSR..

and the SSR..

Standard Smoke Report Form
Variety/Cultivar name: Red-Eye Jedi
Vendor: Hortipharm, Santa Barbara Ca (closing by sept 1, 2008)
Price: $65 1/8th

==================================================
PHYSICAL EXAMINATION
==================================================


1. Visual Appeal: 8
Rate the visual appeal of the buds from 1-10 unappealing-excellent.
Comment: Decent looking sativa nugs, they are of good size in the jar, but the trimming on it was just unacceptable, I must have removed 15% of the weight from the nug before it was smokeable. A lot of the strains they are pushing now are fairly untrimmed which is pretty disappointing at this dispensary, especially at these prices. Fair calyx to leaf ratio, but nothing to write home about.

2. Visible Trichomes: 8.5
Rate the visible trichome content from 1-10 none-totally covered.
Comment: For a sativa it has a good amount and coverage of large trichome heads, there are also a fair amount of smaller longer stalked non-glandular trichomes in the mix, similar to many of the white strains. The coverage on the calyx and bracts is pretty solid, majority of the herb is fairly frosty from stem to leaf.

3. Use an X to indicate the colors that are present in the trichome heads under magnification or list the percentages of each color for
a more precise report.

Clear: 25%
Cloudy: 75%
Amber: 0%
Dark: 0%


4. Mark with X the colors that are present in the buds or for a more detailed color analysis rate presence on a scale 1-9 light-dark.
Brown:
Green: 7 medium shade green, darker fan leaves still on the nugs prior to pics
Gold:
Blue:
Grey: 3 trichomes give it a light grey appearance
White:
Red:
Rust:
Orange: 3 a few rusty colored hairs on the nug
Purple:
Black:


5. Bud density: 7.5
Rate the bud density from 1-10 airy-dense. For samples that are not in their natural state leave this field blank.
Comment: A friendly bud to break up, not too hard and has solid bracts that arent difficult to crumble. Can easily break this up in the palm with one hand for a quick session on the move.

6. Use numbers 1-9 on descriptors that apply to the aroma of freshly broken bud where a one indicates a subtle presence and 9 indicates a pronounced presence.


Fruit....[1]
Citrus...[3]
Musk.....[3]
Spice....[5]
Licorice [2]



7. Aroma: 8
Rate the aroma from 1-10 repulsive-delightful. Use freshly crumbled bud for best results.
Comment: Interesting smell to this one, very spicy and slightly hazy smelling, has a weird citrus musky smell to it that makes you keep sniffing, until you suck a few pieces up there!

8. Seed content: N/A
Rate seed content from 0-10 none-fully seeded.


==================================================
THE SMOKE TEST
==================================================



Address these questions while smoking.


1. Please use a clean instrument for the evaluation. Enter information below that will identify the instrument as follows:
Water pipe (enter bong, hooka, bubbler etc): PHX bong
Vaporizer (enter the brand name):
Pipe (size-type, ie medium-glass):
Joint (enter brand of papers):
Other (specify):


2. Use numbers 1-9 on descriptors that apply to the taste where a one indicates a subtle presence and a
nine indicates a very pronounced presence.

Citrus.....[1]
Musk.......[5]
Spice......[2]
Earthy.....[5]


3. Taste: 4
Rate your impression of the taste from 1-10 unpleasant-delicious.
Comment: Medium flavor on this one, not that strong at all, has a earthy and slightly bland "outdoor" flavor to it.


4. State of dryness: 5
Rate the dryness of the bud from 1-10 wet-dry where 5 is ideal.
comment: Perfect quality when I sampled it, breaks down easy in your fingers.


5. smoke ability: 5
Rate the smoke ability of the sample from 1-10 harsh-smooth.
Comment: Fairly light tickle on the throat, seems to have been lightly flushed or at least used less nutes at the end of the cycle, burns easily with a darker grey ash color.


6. Smoke expansion: 4
Rate how the smoke expands in the lungs from 1-10 stable-explodes.
Comment: Average expansion, not heavy on the lungs, doesn't make you cough heavily.


1. __[3 hits / .5g max ]__ Dosage
Enter the number of hits taken to reach desired effects.
Comment: Fairly strong high after the first bowl, takes an additional two bowls to get me where I want to be.

2. __[4]__ Effect onset
Rate how quickly the effect hit from 1-10 immediate-major creeper.
comment: Hits you fairly quick and builds up over the next 20 minutes or so, a light hazey feeling in the head with a moderate up high.


3. __[6]__ Sativa influence
Rate the sativa influence detected from 0-10 none-extreme. Sativa influence is best described as a clear and energetic mental effect.
comment: Stronger sativa side to this for sure, definatly not a "pure sativa" as the budtender sells it as.

4. __[2]__ Indica influence
Rate the indica influence detected from 0-10 none-extreme. Indica influence is best described as a sedative, lethargic or numbing effect that affects the body.
comment: Not much indica in this one, makes it a good choice for the day


5. __[7]__ Potency
Rate the potency of the sample from 0-10 none-devastating.
comment: A good solid up high to it that lasts for a fair amount of time for most, wouldn't be long enough and possibly not strong enough for the heavy smokers.

6. __[1 hours]__ Duration
Indicate the duration of time that the effects lasted.
comment: Clean high without a strong crash at the end, the high just sort of drifts off after an hour or two, would be a good strain if you puff occasionally through the day.


7. __[6]__ Tolerance build up
Rate how quickly tolerance builds from 0-10 none-rapid. Leave this field blank if you have not used this sample repeatedly.


8. Usability
Rate on a scale of 1-9 where a one indicates the worst time of day to consume this strain and a nine represents the ideal time of day.
Leave field(s) blank if you have not yet formed an opinion.

Morning - wake up [5]
Day - work [8]
Evening - relax []
Night - sleep []


9. __[7]__ Overall satisfaction
Rate your overall satisfaction from 1-10 poor-Holy Grail.


10. __[9]__ Ability and conditions
Ability to judge the sample and the conditions in which it is judged 0-10 newb-head


11.Judging from the sample alone do you personally consider this
strain a keeper for long term use?

Yes [ ]
No [X]


12.Rate the noticeable effects on a scale of 1-9 mild-severe.

Negative Positive
Effect Effect

__[ ]__ __[4]__ Appetite
__[3]__ __[ ]__ Sleep
__[ ]__ __[5]__ Imagination/creativity




FINAL COMMENTS:
This was the recommended sativa at the Hortipharm, I was told it was a pure sativa - apparently that is slang these days for unmanicured. I found the amount of trim on it when I purchased it to be unacceptable, there was a large amount of leaf I had to remove before being able to take fair pics of the nugs.

I enjoyed the smells of this bud when it was freshly ground, wish it would of come out in the flavor a bit more but it is what it is. Flavor was more bland and earthy like an outdoor strain would have to it.

Fair up high to it, nothing to write home about and far from a "pure sativa". It has a clean high to it that would do the trick during the day for a light user but I feel a medical user would need something a bit stronger than this gear.

Overall smokeability wasn't too bad, after cleaning up the bonus leaf it burned clean and didn't have much irritation in the smoke.
 
Top