Cultosaurus
New member
Greetings
This will be the first question that I've had to ask in a lot of years.
On a recent trip to my local head shop, the subject of increasing light came up. I have a 1000 watt that I'm not using and for the coverage of the area, I can move up from the 200 that is there now.
However, the proprietor of the head shop advised that I do not, as I planned, run a long extension from a different circuit. He said that I should use as short a cord as possible and use the extension to power what is there now ( a computer and an aquarium).
My original college education, lo these many . .. many years ago, was for electronics and I can see some reasoning for his advice.
I have checked here and on other sites and I get the same answers. They all relate strictly to making sure that you use a heavy gauge extension and that's the end of the advice.
There are electrical considerations that are not being answered in that advice though. Long runs, even of a sufficiently heavy enough cable will affect the power hitting the input side of the ballast. A long run will also affect the inductance of the circuit.
What this will do is to under power the ballast and cause premature demise of the bulbs - if the losses are severe enough.
My question is this : is there something to what the proprietor is saying? Will a long run on even a very heavy gauge still be a problem for the input to the ballast and it's operation? Or was he erring more on the side of safety than is necessary?
I can't use the present circuit the way it is because it's only a 15 amp and the ballast will take up at least 8 to 9 of that. I might be able to put a light bulb in it with the ballast, but nothing much more than that. The computer supply and aquarium won't be bothered by the move, so doing so is no big deal, just a matter of running the extension. . . .. and then not tripping over it.
Any advice greater than telling me to just use a heavy gauge would be very helpful.
Thanks in advance
Cult
This will be the first question that I've had to ask in a lot of years.
On a recent trip to my local head shop, the subject of increasing light came up. I have a 1000 watt that I'm not using and for the coverage of the area, I can move up from the 200 that is there now.
However, the proprietor of the head shop advised that I do not, as I planned, run a long extension from a different circuit. He said that I should use as short a cord as possible and use the extension to power what is there now ( a computer and an aquarium).
My original college education, lo these many . .. many years ago, was for electronics and I can see some reasoning for his advice.
I have checked here and on other sites and I get the same answers. They all relate strictly to making sure that you use a heavy gauge extension and that's the end of the advice.
There are electrical considerations that are not being answered in that advice though. Long runs, even of a sufficiently heavy enough cable will affect the power hitting the input side of the ballast. A long run will also affect the inductance of the circuit.
What this will do is to under power the ballast and cause premature demise of the bulbs - if the losses are severe enough.
My question is this : is there something to what the proprietor is saying? Will a long run on even a very heavy gauge still be a problem for the input to the ballast and it's operation? Or was he erring more on the side of safety than is necessary?
I can't use the present circuit the way it is because it's only a 15 amp and the ballast will take up at least 8 to 9 of that. I might be able to put a light bulb in it with the ballast, but nothing much more than that. The computer supply and aquarium won't be bothered by the move, so doing so is no big deal, just a matter of running the extension. . . .. and then not tripping over it.
Any advice greater than telling me to just use a heavy gauge would be very helpful.
Thanks in advance
Cult