What's new
  • ICMag with help from Landrace Warden and The Vault is running a NEW contest in November! You can check it here. Prizes are seeds & forum premium access. Come join in!

Police Chief Favors Prop 19

BiG H3rB Tr3E

"No problem can be solved from the same level of c
Veteran
Legalize pot, former San Jose police chief says
Joseph D. McNamara


**California voters have a chance on this November's ballot to bring common
sense to law enforcement by legalizing marijuana for adults. As San Jose's
retired chief of police and a cop with 35 years experience on the front
lines in the war on marijuana, I'm voting yes.
**I've seen the prohibition's terrible impact at close range.
**Like an increasing number of law enforcers, I have learned that most bad
things about marijuana - especially the violence made inevitable by an
obscenely profitable black market - are caused by the prohibition, not by
the plant. Legal marijuana is long overdue, but leading up to November,
wrongheaded opponents will implore Californians with the same old mistaken
arguments to stay the course. Prohibition advocates will promote fear, and
they will ignore the vast bulk of law enforcement and medical experience
on marijuana. People should not be fooled by cannabis opponents' appeal to
prejudices and emotions when they argue:

**-- Regulating cannabis
**will result in an explosion
**of use by young people.
**On the contrary, pot smoking may decrease. Experience and research show
that the United States has among the world's harshest marijuana laws, yet
our consumption rate leads the world and is twice that of the Netherlands,
where cannabis sales to adults have been allowed for decades. Prohibition
doesn't keep marijuana away from young people. Annual U.S. government
surveys consistently show that more than 80 percent of teenagers say that
marijuana is "easy" or "very easy" to obtain. In a recent study from
Columbia University, teenagers said it is easier to get illegal marijuana
than age-regulated alcohol. Under today's laws, pot-dealing criminals
getting rich on marijuana Prohibition don't ask for ID, but licensed
dealers selling alcohol do.
**-- Legalizing marijuana
**will just add one more harmful legal substance to the mix.
**Marijuana is already in the mix. No one can dispute that marijuana already
is widely available. At least 1 in 10 Californians consumed it in the past
year, despite expensive government efforts. The November ballot's
Proposition 19: The Regulate, Control and Tax Cannabis Act of 2010
acknowledges this reality and enables us to manage the cannabis market.
Furthermore, taxing legal cannabis sales will provide steady funding for
local governments that may help avoid layoffs of police and teachers.
**-- Drug gangs will keep selling marijuana
**even under legalization.
**Silly. Who would buy pot on dangerous streets if they could get it at
regulated stores without unsafe impurities? Al Capone and his rivals made
machine-gun battles a staple of 1920s city street life when they fought to
control the illegal alcohol market. No one today shoots up the local
neighborhood to compete in the beer market. The federal Drug Enforcement
Administration estimates that Mexican cartels derive more than 60 percent
of their profits from marijuana. How much did the cartels make last year
dealing in Budweiser, Corona or Dos Equis? Legalization would seriously
cripple their operations. With more than 20,000 people in Mexico killed in
the past three years in drug turf battles, which are spreading north of
the border, undercutting the cartels is an urgent priority for both
Mexicans' and Americans' safety.
**-- More people will drive stoned and will go to work high.
**The initiative makes clear that driving while impaired will remain illegal
and punishable. Plus, after we end prohibition, law enforcers like me will
no longer be distracted making small-time busts. Communities aren't
terrified by pot smokers. When we stop wasting resources on processing
hundreds of thousands of low-level possession cases, we'll be able to
focus on keeping impaired drivers off the road, to concentrate on violent
crime and on making people feel they and their children are safe from
random gang and drug-related shootings. At work, employers will retain
their rights to fire employees whose drug or alcohol use affects their
productivity.
**The same professional politicians who recklessly caused huge budget
deficits predictably are taking an irresponsible position of opposing the
"evil" of cannabis legalization, just as they opposed California voters'
decision a decade ago to legalize medical marijuana. The California Police
Chiefs Association, of which I have been a member for 34 years, is also in
opposition. Personally, I have never even smoked a cigarette, let alone
taken a hit from a bong, and while I have great respect for the police
chiefs, I wouldn't want to live in a country where it is a crime to behave
contrary to the way cops think we should.
**That perhaps brings up the most significant and least considered cost of
criminalizing marijuana - turning people into criminals for behavior of
which we disapprove, even though it doesn't take others' property or
endanger their safety. It is worth remembering that our last three
presidents, Bill Clinton, George W. Bush and Barack Obama, would have been
stigmatized for life and never would have become presidents if they had
been in the wrong place at the wrong time and been busted for pot during
their reckless youthful days. Countless other Americans weren't so lucky.
California voters have an opportunity in November to return reason to our
state by decriminalizing adult use of marijuana.
 
Top