clearheaded
Well-known member
Just wanted to toss an idea out there. May go for alot of old info we got influencing plant selections. anyway, because harvesting amber trichs is fairly ubiquitous particularly for middle experienced growers which perhaps is majority? May be un intentional selection for ambering trichomes, or plants that do it sooner or at a certain time in terp/flower development
follow along and see if may make some sense.
1 plant develops amber trichomes a little sooner and matches up with the best time its terpene profile is peaking particularly alot of monos still there, perhaps in younger trichomes. may mean this plant leans a little more to an affy WLD type.
2. this plant tends to very slowly push ambers and even though trichomes arent the "classic" ratios of amber to be "done" it is harvested and taste is not there even though extra time was given to get amber trichomes...
#2 may have been great if followed the general rule and may get tossed after 1 run because of lack of taste however if was harvested a week earlier with no ambers if may have been great..
Do u think there has been a slight selection by accident for faster ambering plants and perhaps help leed to muddier effects in general for alot of cultivars?
while yes expert growers who are working with a few cultivars very exlusively will know when to harvest. But during a sift you likely arent going to grow that particular cut again so would basically be selecting for faster ambering trichomes or ones at the very least that match closer to peak terpenes. maybe even for longer trichomes that mature/die a little sooner while leaving the others at there higher monoterpene levels or whatever terp having significant flavor/effect?
Also when harvest is obvious at perfect point would likely get better reviews by esp new growers etc etc promoting those varietys.
Just know most of us have seen those plants that dont amber and end up leaving too long and flavor likely has deminished dispite majority being plasticy and/or clear. which may be more prominent in NLD types?
anyway, food for thought, and maybe an extra tiny part of why afgan types may be selected for by accident in hybrids.
follow along and see if may make some sense.
1 plant develops amber trichomes a little sooner and matches up with the best time its terpene profile is peaking particularly alot of monos still there, perhaps in younger trichomes. may mean this plant leans a little more to an affy WLD type.
2. this plant tends to very slowly push ambers and even though trichomes arent the "classic" ratios of amber to be "done" it is harvested and taste is not there even though extra time was given to get amber trichomes...
#2 may have been great if followed the general rule and may get tossed after 1 run because of lack of taste however if was harvested a week earlier with no ambers if may have been great..
Do u think there has been a slight selection by accident for faster ambering plants and perhaps help leed to muddier effects in general for alot of cultivars?
while yes expert growers who are working with a few cultivars very exlusively will know when to harvest. But during a sift you likely arent going to grow that particular cut again so would basically be selecting for faster ambering trichomes or ones at the very least that match closer to peak terpenes. maybe even for longer trichomes that mature/die a little sooner while leaving the others at there higher monoterpene levels or whatever terp having significant flavor/effect?
Also when harvest is obvious at perfect point would likely get better reviews by esp new growers etc etc promoting those varietys.
Just know most of us have seen those plants that dont amber and end up leaving too long and flavor likely has deminished dispite majority being plasticy and/or clear. which may be more prominent in NLD types?
anyway, food for thought, and maybe an extra tiny part of why afgan types may be selected for by accident in hybrids.