oneshot
Active member
Well, I'm betting you're glad you got in when you did then - 10% up each of the last two days ain't bad when the rest of the market is going to shit.
Yep, my portfolio is going to shit right now except for MJNA lol.
Well, I'm betting you're glad you got in when you did then - 10% up each of the last two days ain't bad when the rest of the market is going to shit.
Explosive growth just in the past 2 days. I undid their LST binds to let them spread their wings a little more now that they are nice and bushy.
Hey oneshot...
So you have 10 plants in 5 gal buckets...that looks like a pretty good spread from your ES330. How high above the canopy do you have the lamp to get that kind of coverage?
What is the outer dimension of the canopy...if you don't mind?
I have an ES330 and have been pretty disappointed in the spread...but after seeing your grow, I wonder if I just didn't "trust" in the light enough. I enjoyed the results directly under the lamp but keeping the light at about 12 to 14" from canopy I found the "effective" coverage to be pretty small. ie: 1.5'x2'
You look like you're getting much better coverage than that!??
Thanks
Yeah...wow Oneshot...
Looking good, so you would say you are quite a bit higher than the 12 to 14" I was working with?
Vukman...The trust idea came to me when I see people covering larger areas...but my "distrust" was based on a number of factors.
ie: Use of a light meter...not a high quality one, but still, I was able to see where the light dropped off.
Then use of the cheapest light meter we all own...our eyes, and hands. When I look at the intensity of the light... if I go any higher than 14" away it almost looks like the LED is not even shining on me.
The trust thing is also one of the reasons I ponied up the coin for the Lumigrow...I figured, less BS, a real horticulture light..not just some company trying to rip off growers of weed who they see as easy marks.
Now a bit of disclosure...I don't have my LED alone in a tent like Oneshot here. I have two 3x3 trays right next to each other. Got the LED to get through the summer w/o AC. Instead of 2 600w HPS I ran one with an adjust-a-wing...which gives me an effective coverage of 5'x3'...figured I would take up the rest with the LED.
I think it might have thrown off my view of the LED though...
Oneshot seems to be getting results in a larger area than I was trying to 2'x3' (in fact pretty close to covering one of my trays completely, I end up with a 40"x40" canopy)...I was very pleased with the ES330 performance under the unit, just not psyched with the coverage.
But after seeing this I feel like I just need to raise the light, and not try to visually qualify it so much!!??
Thanks
Do you mean "visually" because it shouldn't matter to the plants, right? I just think you are up a couple of feet over the plants...that's what it looks like anyway. I'm just shocked at the fantastic growth that that is offering you. Goes against everything I know about light diffusion. But your grow looks awesome. As I said before inspiring!the HPS might be blinding out some of the LED light?
Hey,
Yeah I have a 2 tray set up with 600w HPS next to each other. Not in a tent but an insulated "closet". They are up against the wall (the trays) and I have a small walking isle to access everything. (sorry don't have pictures)
As I said for the summer I dialed back my one HPS and added the Lumigrow to take over the other tray. Wanted to keep cool for the hot months.
Back to fall growin now...so the LED is now simply a "sideshow" light. I have it over an 18 gal rubbermaid bin with 2 plants in it recirculating hydro set up. It's also kinda shining on the 3x 5 gal buckets (DWC) that are on the edge of my 600w HPS tray, they are definitely getting light from both sources. But those 3 would grow without the LED there.
I was under the impression that the "inverse square law" or whatever it's called...(I don't claim to be super knowledgeable) was still in effect with LEDs. The law states: the further from the light source you get the exponentially dimmer the light gets. That's why I was trying to stay about a foot away. (that's what the manufacturer recommends if it's a sole source I believe) At a foot away it seems to comfortably cover the 18 gal bin but wouldn't really cover much more.
I might have to set up another "tent" area to test out the actual coverage without having to "count" on the results. You are inspiring me...
Do you mean "visually" because it shouldn't matter to the plants, right? I just think you are up a couple of feet over the plants...that's what it looks like anyway. I'm just shocked at the fantastic growth that that is offering you. Goes against everything I know about light diffusion. But your grow looks awesome. As I said before inspiring!
Sorry about the no pics...I just got up the balls to start writing online. Draconian laws suck!!