What's new
  • As of today ICMag has his own Discord server. In this Discord server you can chat, talk with eachother, listen to music, share stories and pictures...and much more. Join now and let's grow together! Join ICMag Discord here! More details in this thread here: here.

NY Post: Feds patented medical pot… while fighting it

Tudo

Troublemaker
Moderator
ICMag Donor
Veteran
marijuana.jpg

On Oct. 7, 2003, the US government issued Patent No. 6,630,507.
Actor Michael J. Fox and many millions of other Americans — my dear late wife, Tricia, included — could have gotten very excited about this development back then.
But it was, apparently, not the sort of thing Washington wanted advertised.
Patent No. 6,630,507, you see, is for cannabinoids as antioxidants and neuroprotectants. Most people would simply refer to this as medical marijuana.
Who got that patent? The US government gave this patent to itself.
Just so you understand me, this is the same US government that has been fighting the use of marijuana as a drug. Yet its own scientists were claiming a decade ago that marijuana had been effective against a number of diseases.
Here’s what three scientists from the Department of Health and Human Services said in the abstract — or summary — of their findings submitted with the patent application: “The cannabinoids are found to have particular application as neuroproectants, for example in limiting neurological damage following ischemic insults, such as stroke or trauma, or the treatment of neurological diseases, such as Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease and HIV dementia.”
Fox has had Parkinson’s for many years. My wife suffered for nearly a decade from Multiple Sclerosis, a neurological disease, before she died nearly two years ago.
I don’t know if Fox is secretly using marijuana to ease his pain, but in a minute I’ll tell you why finding out about Patent No. 6,630,507 this week angers me.
Just last week Attorney General Eric Holder said the Federal government will not attempt to challenge state laws that allow for medical and recreational use of pot. His directive will affect 20 states that now allow marijuana to be used for medical purposes, as well as Colorado and Washington, where marijuana can be used for recreational purposes.
The new guidelines do not change marijuana’s classification as an illegal drug. The issue of marijuana’s effectiveness as a pharmaceutical, as far as I know, has never been mentioned by Washington.
Marijuana plants contain a lot of different chemicals. Tetrahydrocannabinol — or THC — is considered the most active of them. Civilizations have known for thousands of years that marijuana had special properties. In a Hindu text the weed is referred to as “sacred grass.”
Despite a track record of thousands of years, Americans are still debating whether we should allow sick people to relieve symptoms of nausea and pain with pot because marijuana may sometimes end up in the wrong hands.
This past week, for instance, New Jersey changed medical marijuana legislation — again. If Govs. Jon Corzine and Chris Christie hadn’t been so pigheaded over the past few years, my wife and others might have suffered a lot less.
Jersey’s medical pot law was passed years ago but hasn’t even gone into effect yet. A revision in the law will permit licensed dispensaries to grow and sell more than three varieties of the weed and provide an edible version for children.
Christie now gets a chance to drag his feet some more before he signs the revised bill. But don’t feel too sorry for New Jersey residents. New York doesn’t even have a medical marijuana law in the works.
Usually I don’t talk about my own life in this column — unless it’s something strange, odd or funny.
My experience with medical marijuana was none of those, but I’ll tell it anyway.
Tricia had been diagnosed with MS in 1992. It wasn’t until around 2002 that she became truly helpless. MS is an inflammatory disease in which the insulating covers of nerve cells in the brain and spinal cord are damaged.
Tricia was on so many drugs — pain killers, muscle relaxants, antidepressants, etc. — I lost count
The idea of using marijuana to ease Tricia’s severe spasms — which could last 30 minutes or more — came up frequently. But the law was a problem.
New Jersey hadn’t implemented its medical marijuana law, so I would need to acquire the drug the old-fashioned way — on the street.
I knew that if I got caught buying pot illegally I could have been fired from my job and lose my medical coverage. That would have taken me several steps backwards.
Another one of Tricia’s many doctors had us try a synthetic form of THC — the marijuana chemical — but we had to pretend that my wife was suffering through weeping spells because that’s what the drug was intended for.
She wasn’t weeping. In fact Tricia was about as happy as anyone could be under those circumstances, but we played along.
Knowing what I do now, I regret not taking the risk of getting pot on the street.
Experts say that the potential for marijuana as a drug is endless. Dr. Gerry Crabtree, chief executive officer of drug firm Nuvilex, says it has even proven in tests to be effective against cancer.
“There’s enough literature in respectable scientific journals to justify examining cannabis as a possible treatment of cancer,” Crabtree told me this week.
You won’t really appreciate what I’m talking about until someone you love might be helped by medical marijuana. But you will probably never understand just how angry I am after finding out about Patent No. 6,630,507.
http://nypost.com/2013/09/11/feds-patented-medical-marijuana-even-when-they-were-fighting-it/
 

dank.frank

ef.yu.se.ka.e.em
ICMag Donor
Veteran
Slowly but surely eyes are opening to the things us growers have known all along...

The government is corrupt and repressing information for the sake of the companies who put dollars in their campaigns...

It's disgusting...and it should make us angry.



dank.Frank
 

bombadil.360

Andinismo Hierbatero
Veteran
not only angry, but we should demand justice; in other words, every single politician and federal agent that has supported prohibition should face grave consequences; minimum jail sentences of 15 years and such I'd suggest; they are the real criminals.
 

NEGT1

Member
So how does this work? What does it mean? Does the government sell the patent or start production...?

Anyone?
 

bombadil.360

Andinismo Hierbatero
Veteran
So how does this work? What does it mean? Does the government sell the patent or start production...?

Anyone?


it means that while they explicitly know that cannabis has medicinal benefits, they maintain the plant hostage as a schedule 1 substance, which means it has no medicinal value and is way too dangerous to let people near it.

it means that they are preparing to monopolize the medical cannabis industry with said patent as well.

it means they are hypocrites, to put it lightly.
 

NEGT1

Member
I apologize my question was not direct.

While I agree with you, we've known the US government has been studying the plant for decades. We've known it has medical value, and we've known the federal government in corrosion with state governments to make back door deals with the pharmaceutical industry and any large doner or lobbyist.

This was bound to happen, we've known this has been happening. The article itself isn't surprising. US politics isn't new...in fact politics isn't new.

I'm asking if anyone has specific because I have no idea how this realistically might work out. Do we think UCann might benefit from this patent more directly than others?
 

bombadil.360

Andinismo Hierbatero
Veteran
I apologize my question was not direct.

While I agree with you, we've known the US government has been studying the plant for decades. We've known it has medical value, and we've known the federal government in corrosion with state governments to make back door deals with the pharmaceutical industry and any large doner or lobbyist.

This was bound to happen, we've known this has been happening. The article itself isn't surprising. US politics isn't new...in fact politics isn't new.

I'm asking if anyone has specific because I have no idea how this realistically might work out. Do we think UCann might benefit from this patent more directly than others?


lately I've caught myself preaching to the choir way more than I like...

as for your specific question, I can only speculate... but obivously it will give them unique rights to market and profit from their specific cannabis-based medicines; so no one else can duplicate them and market them. as you know, the patent's purpose is like those of copyright / publishing rights.

peace
 

russjcan

Member
Uncle Sam licenses the patent to GW Pharmacuticals and then they market Satavix around the world. Here's a list I found.
2003 - 6630507
2006 - 20060I60888
70889I4
20060I07084
7025992
20060039959
2006024289 This ones for a method of Cultivation
7I09245
20070020I93
20080057II7
2007004I994
20070049645 This one treats diabetes
20070099987

I haven't been able to find these. Thought about asking my Senator Feinstein to send me a copy of the cultivation one just so I don't infringe on their methods.
 
Top