G
Guest
I guess Nasa is working on growing plants with the best effeciency possible...I guess it is working out pretty well, can anyone share their experience with these. Thanks
Quote- ('This is pretty neat- were using red LEDS to grow lettuce, and have found it to be 60% more efficient than fluorescent light when growing vegetables hydroponically. The red LED technology produces 7000 heads of lettuce per day all year round in a 10-floor building on just 1000 square meters of space. The lettuce matures more than three times as fast under the LEDs than outdoors.")
From what I have been reading only 25% of light is absorbed by the plant from your average 1000watter. the other 75% of unused light just generates heat.
Now, plants absorb light (via Chlorophyll-A) most at around 430nm (+/- 20nm) blue and 662nm (+/-20nm) red wavelengths.
Quote- ('This is pretty neat- were using red LEDS to grow lettuce, and have found it to be 60% more efficient than fluorescent light when growing vegetables hydroponically. The red LED technology produces 7000 heads of lettuce per day all year round in a 10-floor building on just 1000 square meters of space. The lettuce matures more than three times as fast under the LEDs than outdoors.")
From what I have been reading only 25% of light is absorbed by the plant from your average 1000watter. the other 75% of unused light just generates heat.
Now, plants absorb light (via Chlorophyll-A) most at around 430nm (+/- 20nm) blue and 662nm (+/-20nm) red wavelengths.
Last edited: