What's new
  • ICMag with help from Landrace Warden and The Vault is running a NEW contest in November! You can check it here. Prizes are seeds & forum premium access. Come join in!

Indoor/outdoor busts per state 2005

inflorescence

inflorescence

Active member
Veteran
Look at the "value of assets seized" between CA and IN.
IN took in ~half the assets as CA yet only 1/57 the "total plants cultivated".
This proves that some states are only in it for the money they can seize.
How can congress look at those stats and not see that it's all about asset forfeiture for some states. Those states asset forfeiture laws need to be repealed because of the clear conflict of interest. I mean you don't get asset forfeiture for catching a rapist so states like IN are gonna focus more on MJ then real crime, a clear conflict of interest.

Also, a third of ALL assets seized from the entire united states were from CA. :yoinks:
 
Last edited:
inflorescence

inflorescence

Active member
Veteran
I think I'm misreading this cause Texas says 10,000 total plants eradicated but 60,000 lbs bulk processed MJ. Isn't that 6 lbs per plant (on average) :yoinks:
Maybe the bulk processed MJ includes all the mexi brick kilos brought up and stored in Texas and the bulk figure means total poundage, not necessarily just from the eradicated plants. I guess that's why texas only seized $31,000.
They musta busted one trailer full of approx 50,000 lbs. lol
 
Last edited:
G

Guest

Maybe I missed something, but I think that a 'per capita' count of busts and amounts of seizures would mean a whole lot more in some ways.

Alaska and Wyoming have populations nearly small enough to fit into a coupla' row boats (**yes, that was exageration), while New York and California have an entire country's population squeezed into various sizes of geographic packages.

Cooking the numbers down to 'per 100,000 ppopulation' would make an easier comparison. Did they already do that, and I simply missed it??

moose eater
 
Last edited:
H

Hunt4Hazez

Member
inflorescence said:
Look at the "value of assets seized" between CA and IN.
IN took in ~half the assets as CA yet only 1/57 the "total plants cultivated".
This proves that some states are only in it for the money they can seize.
How can congress look at those stats and not see that it's all about asset forfeiture for some states...
Also, a third of ALL assets seized from the entire united states were from CA. :yoinks:
Click to expand...


How do you think the d ea still makes a living. Seizing assets and cash/bankaccounts from "drug dealers" is a big chunk of PIG revenue
 
inflorescence

inflorescence

Active member
Veteran
Hunt4Hazez said:
How do you think the d ea still makes a living. Seizing assets and cash/bankaccounts from "drug dealers" is a big chunk of PIG revenue
Click to expand...

That's what I was trying to point out.
A lot of people I know agree with me that mid states like IN, etc. have totally crazy asset forfeiture laws and then I try to tell them that CA is just as bad, they always say, "nah, CA has revised it's asset forfeiture laws so CA is no where near as bad as the pre-historic forfeiture laws like in IN."
Well guess what CA, think again!
 
masterlow37

masterlow37

Active member
Veteran
I trully don't believe this is all the indoor bust, i'm sure theres quite a bit of local/sheriff/police bust not recorded by the dea. Anyone live or know someone that lives in GA that have seen/heard of local indoor bust ?
 
robotwithdreams

robotwithdreams

Active member
Veteran
^^yeah some of these states seem too good to be true , leading me to think these numbers are not complete, and just based on DEA involvment. Not sure thoough.
 
V

VIKINGtrich

Member
WOW , Virginia looks like another state that loves to take peoples money, cars, homes, etc....As opposed to North Carolina, they dont hardly take assetts... VA sucks HUGE COCK...what a fucking shit hole.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Latest posts

Top