A federal appeals court upheld the conviction and 10-year sentence Wednesday of a medical marijuana advocate who grew 32,000 pot plants for patients and fellow Rastafarians on his land in Lake County.
The federal judge who sent Charles "Eddy" Lepp to prison in 2009 criticized the federal law that required a 10-year term for growing at least 1,000 marijuana plants. But U.S. District Judge Marilyn Hall Patel of San Francisco said she was bound by the law, and the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals agreed.
"The statutory minimum sentence is not cruel and unusual punishment," the three-judge panel said.
Federal agents arrested Lepp in 2004 after finding the marijuana plants in gardens near his home in Upper Lake, most of them in view of Highway 20.
He said the plants were for patients who had a right to use marijuana with their doctors' approval under California law. Lepp also said that he was a Rastafarian minister, for whom marijuana is a sacrament, and that he was growing the plants for 2,500 members of his church who were sharecroppers.
Federal law strictly bans marijuana, however, even in states that allow its medical use. The appeals court upheld Patel's refusal to allow Lepp to invoke his religion as a defense to the charges, saying his prosecution served the government's "compelling interest in preventing diversion of sacramental marijuana to non-religious users."
Lepp's lawyer, Michael Hinckley, had argued that the 10-year sentence was grossly disproportionate to the crimes. Hinckley said that he was disappointed by Wednesday's ruling and that "the thought of him spending 10 years in prison, in circumstances like these, is tragic."
E-mail Bob Egelko at [email protected].
This article appeared on page C - 2 of the San Francisco Chronicle
Eddy essentially got a Life Sentence--
He believes that Cannabis should be 100% Legal, with no limitations-- I don't know if he knowingly Martyred himself, hoping it would further the Cause...or if he simply got excited after 215 and 420, and thought he would win the fight...having State Law on his side--
Either way, this is a blatant example of why Cannabis MUST be legalized...or at least whatever form of Legalization we can get passed!!
Not liking the wording of a Legalization Initiative...or being afraid of what the Feds might do if it passed...or worrying about Monsanto...or being afraid of losing $$...all those are weak arguments, in any context--
If it gets our foot in the door, and puts Legalization of Cannabis on the Law books...we MUST vote for it, and at least get the ball rolling for True Legalization in the future-- This insanity must stop--