What's new
  • ICMag with help from Phlizon, Landrace Warden and The Vault is running a NEW contest for Christmas! You can check it here. Prizes are: full spectrum led light, seeds & forum premium access. Come join in!

Destroyer thread deleted? Why?

Status
Not open for further replies.

wh1p3dm34t

Modortalan
Supermod
Veteran
🦫 Special 🍆
double standard? tell me some, all the vendors are archived that have stopped to be vendors anymore.. what is the double standard in this?

and the threads that was created by members, and they asked to move them out, all requests were fullfilled.
 
Last edited:

Tranquilidade

Well-known member
Why is the valuable documentation of one of the most notable Sativa strains being overlooked? The exclusion seems to be based on the fact that the subject was once a vendor but is no longer active in that role. Couldn't this issue be resolved by relocating the content outside of the vendor-specific area? For instance, I initiated a discussion on RSC Burmese; does this mean the thread can't exist if RSC is not a vendor? This rationale is confusing to me.
 

wh1p3dm34t

Modortalan
Supermod
Veteran
🦫 Special 🍆
there is a little bit of difference advertising <--> discussing, that thread was made by charlie garcia, i doubt he will come back and ask to move it anywhere
 

exploziv

pure dynamite
Administrator
Veteran
Let's put it in a different way. Before, we usually hid vendors subforums if they didn't paid anymore. Now they will continue to be available, and we are working to make more of what's been hidden in the past available soon. Is it still a bad thing?
 

Tranquilidade

Well-known member
Let's put it in a different way. Before, we usually hid vendors subforums if they didn't paid anymore. Now they will continue to be available, and we are working to make more of what's been hidden in the past available soon. Is it still a bad thing?
Yes, it certainly is. Up until now, that thread was the best resource on this particular variety, unmatched not only within this forum but across the entire internet. Many people found this thread not only through Icmag searches but also via external search engines. Currently, all these links lead to dead ends, creating a poor user experience for those outside the IC domain. Additionally, by making more content accessible for everyone, you could benefit from displaying more ads. This approach, however, does not serve your interests, but I guess the politics are more important. Sorry, not convinced.
 

wh1p3dm34t

Modortalan
Supermod
Veteran
🦫 Special 🍆
at least 35-40 other vendors threads lead to error, and most of them were hidden, not even archived.
 

wh1p3dm34t

Modortalan
Supermod
Veteran
🦫 Special 🍆
Let's put it in a different way. Before, we usually hid vendors subforums if they didn't paid anymore. Now they will continue to be available, and we are working to make more of what's been hidden in the past available soon. Is it still a bad thing?
what is the difference, if it was hidden totally or shared at the archives which is at the veteran/premium area?
 

exploziv

pure dynamite
Administrator
Veteran
Forum needs money to run in order to keep the rest of the links from becoming dead ends. We also giving them as benefits to our long time members and we make them available to premium users as well. There were just a few vendor subforums that were left visible, the rest were hidden. They will be all there in the archive soon. Better than never. And hopefully, IcMag lives!
 
Last edited:

Chi13

Well-known member
ICMag Donor
Forum needs money to run in order to keep the rest of the links from becoming dead ends. We also giving them as benefits to our long time members and we make them available to premium users as well. There were just a few vendor subforums that were left visible, the rest were hidden. They will be all there in the archive soon. Better than never. And hopefully, IcMag lives!
I signed up here in 2008 but had to delete my old account due to what I thought were security issues. Some of those old threads contain photos I no longer have and now can't access for another 8 years or so. I'm not a young guy. Why not make the archive available to us all? I can't see the harm in that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top