"We calculate with 1000 umol m-2 s-1 for the generative phase (flowering, 12 hours cycle) and 670 umol m-2 s-1 for the vegetative phase (18 hours veg cycle). This is because your plants get 50% more light in the vegetative phase because you light them 18 hours instead of 12. The daily light integral (DLI, total amount of light the plants get per day) stays the same this way. " (Gavita)
I had not been informed of the fact that one should illuminate their plants during vegetative and flowering to achieve similar intensity (correct terminology?).
I see a lot of literature suggesting a 24/7 lighting regimen, as well as 20/4, but they don't explain why and at what point photo inhibition occurs or significant diminishing returns.
I will now employ a 8-4-8-4 vegetative schedule, per the suggestion of member d9. Thus allowing enough time during dark cycle to ensure proper utilization of stored energy. I'll need to measure the light intensity to ensure ideal illumination to ease transition to flower.
More emphasis should be place on efficient utilization of lighting, as it is a significant cost and determinant of quality. There is an ideal range and we must focus more effort to measure it seems, akin to the importance/necessity of ec/ppm tools. Is this realistic?
I had not been informed of the fact that one should illuminate their plants during vegetative and flowering to achieve similar intensity (correct terminology?).
I see a lot of literature suggesting a 24/7 lighting regimen, as well as 20/4, but they don't explain why and at what point photo inhibition occurs or significant diminishing returns.
I will now employ a 8-4-8-4 vegetative schedule, per the suggestion of member d9. Thus allowing enough time during dark cycle to ensure proper utilization of stored energy. I'll need to measure the light intensity to ensure ideal illumination to ease transition to flower.
More emphasis should be place on efficient utilization of lighting, as it is a significant cost and determinant of quality. There is an ideal range and we must focus more effort to measure it seems, akin to the importance/necessity of ec/ppm tools. Is this realistic?