What's new

D.C. Council bill proposes up to 5 medical marijuana dispensaries!

C

CannaCompulsory

[SIZE=+2][/SIZE]The District would have up to five medical marijuana dispensaries where seriously ill patients could go to obtain the drug from a licensed vendor under a bill proposed Tuesday by D.C. Council member David A. Catania.

Catania's proposal, which was co-sponsored by nine of 13 council members, is designed to implement a 1998 voter-approved initiative that called for the legalization of medical marijuana in the District.

After Initiative 59 was approved with 69 percent of the vote, the then-GOP-controlled Congress blocked it from being implemented. But the Democratic-controlled Congress removed those restrictions last month.

Under Catania's proposal, the District would have what he calls "a closed system to regulate the cultivation, distribution and possession of marijuana."

"What I wanted to make sure we don't do is take something that is evidence-based and scientifically proven for medicine and turn that into a system where there is an opportunity for mischief," said Catania (I-At Large).

The legislation, which has been referred to both the Health and Public Safety and Judiciary committees, would allow the dispensaries to distribute up to a month's supply of marijuana to either to patients or their registered caregivers. Although patients would have to pay for the drug, the legislation requires providers to supply low-income patients with marijuana at a reduced price.

Once implemented, the District would be the 15th location in the nation to permit medical marijuana. On Monday, his last day in office, New Jersey Gov. Jon S. Corzine signed the law legalizing medical marijuana in that state.

"We have seen an increasing number of states that have moved in the direction of permitting medical marijuana, so we are moving forward," said council member Phil Mendelson (D-At Large), chairman of the Committee on Public Safety and the Judiciary.

Catania's measure calls for the mayor's office and the Department of Health to set most of the regulations for how the city's medical marijuana policy would work. The Health Department, for example, will have to establish a list of medical conditions that can qualify a patient for a doctor's prescription to obtain the drug.

The administration would also be charged with determining what companies get licensed to grow and distribute the marijuana. One unanswered question is where the marijuana would be grown.

Catania said it would most likely have to be grown somewhere in the District to avoid local drug laws in neighboring Maryland and Virginia.

Catania's amendment states a dispensary cannot be located within 1,000 feet of a school or youth center. It also prohibits felons and individuals with drug convictions from owning or working in a dispensary.

"Moving forward, this legislation will enable the District to implement an effective and responsible medical marijuana program that will be a model for other states," Catania said.

[SIZE=-1]By Tim Craig
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, January 19, 2010; 1:28 PM
Source:http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/01/19/AR2010011902488.html

CANNACOMPULSORY COMMENTARY: Wow, I didnt even know there was an initiative for Medical Marijuana in DC! Well, it did happen 12 FUCKN YEARS AGO! Thanks to the GOP, the party of NO, it is only being enacted now...kinda depressing and hopeful news at the same time i guess..
[/SIZE]
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Hydro-Soil

Active member
Veteran
Under Catania's proposal, the District would have what he calls "a closed system to regulate the cultivation, distribution and possession of marijuana."
They're delusional.

Princess Diesel works better for my head than anything going. A lot of strains are 'Ok' and will work as a general medicine for me and a bunch more are just 'WRONG' for my head.

What structure do they have in place to make sure that each person has a strain available to them that is at least 'acceptable'?



The issue is legislation without representation. Until someone that has an F'ng clue about cannabis is involved.... spewing legislation is not the answer.

NO LEGISLATION WITHOUT EQUAL REPRESENTATION!


Edit: Not even going to touch how ridiculous it is to insist that a certain number of outlets is even a topic worth discussing.
 

fatigues

Active member
Veteran
Changing the legislation now after the voters approved it (which is what this 5 licensed dispensaries system would do ) seems undemocratic, given that voters approved something vastly more open than that. But, as I understand it, ballot proposals are entirely non-binding on DC and the council will do as they please. I understand the legal reasoning - but the political reasoning seems odd to me. Why engage in new politics on the specifics when the voters have already decided?

I suppose one unlooked for spin-off of the Obama Federal Gov and State detente on the MMJ issue is that it permits a move towards Canadian style government dispensing. There are a number of good things about this - and a number of bad ones, too.

The New Jersey model, which prohibits personal growing, seems the most unnecessarily restrictive MMJ law yet. I honestly don't understand the practical political problem which made that approach the only viable legislation in New Jersey.

As for D.C., the council appears to have taken a specific ballot proposal approved by nearly 2/3rds of the citizens of DC, which such proposal as drafted is, beyond any doubt, the most broad and liberally permissive MMJ law in the USofA -- and needlessly watered it down after having it spend a dozen years in the morgue for the liberal language it employed.

Doesn't really make a whole lot of sense to me. They've paid the political price - why go back on the will of the people now? Doesn't democracy matter to these councillors? I'm missing something here. Even your average right-wing tea party nutbar would have a hard time going back on what the people actually voted for in a specific ballot box measure. What gives?
 

bergerbuddy

Canna Coco grower
Veteran
Haha... So now the TPB will decide WHO can distribute... and anyone who has EVER been busted say for... felony possesion of cannabis... WELL THEY CAN NEVER OWN OR WORK THERE...

This is THE HORRIBLE thing to come from legalization.... I mean.. as long as an individual patient can grow his own and fuck the state and fuck the disps.. fine..

But I bet that aint an option.....

One more thing.... doesn't sound like there is gonna be any restriction of displaying a pot leaf outside your business.... Just having someone with a drug conviction working there..
 
A

alpinestar

Monopoweed

Monopoweed

im sure it will be top quality :rolleyes:

on the bright side, at least they are going to get something in terms of medical access
 

IWanaGetHiSoHi

Active member
DCs license plates display their angst ... "Taxation Without Representation". It does no good to SCREAM that word where it means literally Nothing.
 

fatigues

Active member
Veteran
That's different. In Michigan - that bill won't go anywhere outside that committee. That's just grandstanding for their base.

In D.C., what the council is doing actually WILL have legal effect. And they aren't Republicans grandstanding for their base. They are hardcore Democrats.
 

buddydro

Member
I can not think of a better place for the majority to stand up and flex our muscle and get this settled right here.

Press would have a hard time boycotting this kind of coverage .

D.C. baby. Great place for another D-Day!

buddy
 

Latest posts

Latest posts

Top