What's new
  • ICMag with help from Landrace Warden and The Vault is running a NEW contest in November! You can check it here. Prizes are seeds & forum premium access. Come join in!

Chemdawg D (??) vs Pacific's G13...

Status
Not open for further replies.

REZDOG

Active member
Veteran
beancounter said:
About danko's 'D' restrictions, I'm pretty sure he got the same or similar restrictions as anyone who received any of the chem cuts straight from chemdog.. that there should be no commercial breeding done, and that it's given to good people, sparingly..
...

Funny....Actually,there was never any agreement between Chem and myself regarding breeding with his parent stock.
When we talked,it was about not spreading the clones around,not about not breeding with them.
In fact,we talked briefly about what I might do with some of them,after I grew them out,got a feel for them and took my measure of 'em. We agreed to discuss joint projects in the future,(he's still got some genetics in the vault,whohoo!) and that was about it,short & sweet.
Since then,there's been lots of confusion online,regarding some of Chem's parent stock,and that's a shame.
The big problem: When people post conjecture about what they think that Chem thinks,and people take them seriously.

....My ongoing two pence and a farthing.


.


CDD:





 
G

Guest

cannigrow said:
Seriously though REz, you didn't even have that clone before too long ago. I've been smoking the chem d for almost 4 years now, and know for a fact that at least 6 or 7 people in the homebase area have chemdawg family clones. Plus several more on here and it's probably more like 20. I've got the sister, confirmed no bullshit from one of CDs buddies. When chemdog releases seeds, a lot of this bullshit will subside because people will want to get them straight from him, knowing full well he's had a handle on these strains for over a decade and will know what to do when making seeds. BY the time people start sprouting those, they'll find more amazing phenos and we'll have forgotten about most of this BS.


finally someone tel;ling it like it really is in real life. I bet chemdogg is in a lot of peoples hands that dont play the internet hands. sometimes you cant trust your own brother to keep his word so how can you expect some internet cats to. Is it really that big of a deal as the dude above says when chem releases his seeds peeps who purchased other peoples seeds will definately buy those just to make sure!

I know I would!
dd
 
G

Guest

REZDOG said:
Funny....Actually,there was never any agreement between Chem and myself regarding breeding with his parent stock.
When we talked,it was about not spreading the clones around,not about not breeding with them.
In fact,we talked briefly about what I might do with some of them,after I grew them out,got a feel for them and took my measure of 'em. We agreed to discuss joint projects in the future,(he's still got some genetics in the vault,whohoo!) and that was about it,short & sweet.
Since then,there's been lots of confusion online,regarding some of Chem's parent stock,and that's a shame.
The big problem: When people post conjecture about what they think that Chem thinks,and people take them seriously.

....My ongoing two pence and a farthing.


.


CDD:










but you did say he didnt want you selling seeds until he did. IT WAS IN YOUR FORUM BACK IN THE DAYS!LOL
 
G

Guest

Grat3fulh3ad said:
So, from what I'm reading Danko, Outkast, beancounter, and joeshmoe, and others all have 'unrestricted' Chemdog D cuts...
Odd that a cut is so closely held and restricted by some, and yet freely given out with no restrictions at the same time... Not trying to 'stir the pot' or anything, but that seems not to make any sense...


JUST MY 2CENTS...HE PROBABLY KNOW THE ONES WHO ARE GONNA TRY AND MAKE A QUICK BUCK HENCE RESTRICTIONS!!1
 

Pbud

Member
I think the chem d is the closest to the original dogbud. I haven't smoked the sister yet but from the others i think the chem d and then #4 are the closest. The smell of the d is so strong and dank it really brings me back to 91 and the dog.
 

damakkus

West Coast ICer
Hey fellas, for those that have or think they have LOL smoked the chem D what was it like?

IMO the sample of chem D I tried instantly reminded me of OG would that be or sound right? Not that it matters I am just curious.
 
Word

Word

Hey guys . just wanted to ask my 2 cents. Danny has the real cut and that's a fact. I can assure everyone he is a man of his word, unlike some of the people who troll on him and the magazine.I'm sure he will chime in and put this silly thread to rest. Some of you guys have to much time on your hands. If you don't like the mag then don't read it. It's that simple. oh ,and what if "O" just made a mistake on labeling. Does that merit 25 pages? :yoinks: And i do believe that restrictions were put on breeding since Chem was in the works to release Dog daze under Doghouse seeds...remember that label???the pic is prob still up on ********..
If i was starting a company and one of the products that i created was gifted( nothing traded back in return) to someone else as a sign of goodwill, and then that person begain using that product for their own company(hmmmmmm.charity?how do you prove it's for charity?), before the seeds were officially released under dog house. well that would piss me off to say the least.And if chem said he didn't want the seeds made then he would look like he wasn't supporting charity.Looks like he was pushed into a wall. So it makes perfect sense that he wouldn't want his strains to be put into seed production under someone else. Yea, he's def a respectable dude, one of the nicest/ least shady/least egotistical people i've personally, met on here.wish i could say that about others...lol :chin:

oh and can we say UNTESTED SEEDS FOR $2,000.00 + ... O SnaP! and people complain about a couple of stupid fake weed advertisers. :wave:
 
Last edited:

Burt

Well-known member
Veteran
thanks for clearing the air so to speak
while i agree with everything you have pointed out-can we get rid of the fake weed adverts?
 

exactlywatt

Active member
beancounter said:
Despite a few uncalled for comments this thread has been simply excellent and civil, and an example of how things like this should be worked out in the open here on IC..


We are closer to the truth and no one has been banned, ignored, or put on invisible. that is a great acomplishment and we all should be proud.

Let's hope we can keep it up yall...
 
G

Guest

damn, there goes the civil thread...


edit: truth or not, there's going to be a sweet online fight now. :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:

exactlywatt

Active member
beancounter said:
Despite a few uncalled for comments this thread has been simply excellent and civil, and an example of how things like this should be worked out in the open here on IC..


We are closer to the truth and no one has been banned, ignored, or put on invisible. that is a great acomplishment and we all should be proud.


in case you missed it the first time, or the second! This thread is going to hell, admin should be on the lookout.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top