Poopy, you quoted me, just had to disagree and than repeated what I said.
and decreases the water holding capacity
vs.
cut down the water holding capacity alot....
Seriously?
haha must of read that wrong my bad bro.. i smoke alot... haha
Poopy, you quoted me, just had to disagree and than repeated what I said.
and decreases the water holding capacity
vs.
cut down the water holding capacity alot....
Seriously?
hi Spanishwilly,I don't think that's right. It's called coco mix but it's all coco I believe. Anyway, I guess I have to vote against it.
hi Spanishwilly,
your opinion is more than welcome, but, don't you think that you have to
try it out first, and then vote for it?
i'm using "down to earth" coco, and with a quick sparge, am quite happy with it.
It would seem that the consensus says: All brands give solid results, without one being superior over the others. Furthermore, pre-rinsing is done just to be "safe", but chances are that each bag is ready to go as-is. Selection should then be made according to composition/consistency and whatever is the best bang for the buck.
Or did I not fully understand what went on in the previous five pages?
I find it curious that no one has initiated a discussion about the various additives each company adds in their coco product. Ex: tricoderma in canna, worm casings/kelp/guano in roots, and supposed beneficials in atami bcuzz. I guess in the end it doesn't really matter. It's all just marketing?