What's new

Bernie Sanders: Nix Cannabis From Dangerous Drugs List

RetroGrow

Active member
Veteran
Well, Bernie Sanders came out and said what needed to be said. Now, if only he wasn't a communist in favor of further destroying our country with unchecked immigration. You can't have everything.

"Presidential hopeful Bernie Sanders will announce his support Wednesday for removing marijuana from a list of the most dangerous drugs outlawed by the federal government — a move that would free states to legalize it without impediments from Washington.

The self-described democratic socialist senator from Vermont plans to share his proposal during a town hall meeting with college students that will be broadcast on the Internet across the country from George Mason University in Fairfax, Va.

“Too many Americans have seen their lives destroyed because they have criminal records as a result of marijuana use,” Sanders says in prepared remarks for the event provided to The Washington Post. “That’s wrong. That has got to change.”

No other presidential candidate has called for marijuana to be completely removed from the schedule of controlled substances regulated by the Drug Enforcement Administration.

Longshot Democratic hopeful Martin O’Malley has said he’d put marijuana on Schedule 2, a less strict designation. The party’s front-runner, Hillary Rodham Clinton, has repeatedly said she wants to see how legalization experiments in Colorado, Washington and other states play out before committing to any changes at the federal level.
Sanders’s plan would not automatically make marijuana legal nationwide, but states would be allowed to regulate the drug in the same way that state and local laws now govern sales of alcohol and tobacco. And people who use marijuana in states that legalize it would no longer be at risk of federal prosecution.

His plan would also allow marijuana businesses currently operating in states that have legalized it to use banking services and apply for tax deductions that are currently unavailable to them under federal law.

In a 2013 memo, the Justice Department essentially agreed to look the other way in states where marijuana is legal, provided that the marijuana industry in those states remained in compliance with state laws. But this memo isn’t legally binding, and a new administration or a new attorney general could easily reverse course.

Marijuana’s current classification is reserved for drugs with no medically accepted use and a “high potential for abuse.”
Most researchers who work in drug policy say that this designation isn’t appropriate. Last week, the Brookings Institution said that marijuana’s current scheduling status is “stifling medical research.” The American Medical Association has called for marijuana’s scheduling status to be “reviewed with the goal of facilitating the conduct of clinical research.”

Sanders has hinted at his position previously, including during a broadcast last week on “Jimmy Kimmel Live” on ABC during which he said: “I am not unfavorably disposed to moving toward the legalization of marijuana.”

“We have more people in jail today than any other country on earth,” Sanders told Kimmel. “We have large numbers of lives that have been destroyed because of this war on drugs, and because people were caught smoking marijuana and so forth. I think we have got to end the war on drugs.”

In response to a question during the first Democratic debate, Sanders said he would vote in favor of a local Nevada measure that would legalize recreational pot use.

“I would vote yes because I am seeing in this country too many lives being destroyed for non-violent offenses,” he said. “We have a criminal justice system that lets CEOs on Wall Street walk away, and yet we are imprisoning or giving jail sentences to young people who are smoking marijuana.”

In the first debate, Clinton said she supports the legalization of medical marijuana and alternatives to imprisoning people for non-violent drug crimes. But she stopped short of endorsing legalization, saying she wants “to find out a lot more than we know today” about the experiences of states like Colorado and Washington.

Sanders’s proposal is in line with the thinking of a growing number of Americans and a solid majority of Democrats.

According to a Gallup poll published earlier this month, national support for legalizing pot is at an all-time high, with 58 percent of those surveyed supporting such an outcome.

[National support for legal pot is at an all-time high]

Still, the ability of Sanders or any Democratic president to move the needle on federal marijuana policy through a reclassification of the drug is likely to face stiff resistance in a Republican controlled Congress.

Medical marijuana is now sold in nearly half of all states, and even one red state has legalized it for recreational use. Veterans of wars in Iraq and Afghanistan are clamoring for access to treat post-traumatic stress disorder. Loosening pot laws polls better in three swing states than any 2016 presidential candidate.

But in July, conservative House Republicans killed a bipartisan proposal to create a sub-class for marijuana so researchers could simply study the substance legally and offer fresh guidance on whether it should continue to be classified alongside heroin and ecstasy as one of the most dangerous."

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...8c3adc-7da2-11e5-b575-d8dcfedb4ea1_story.html
 

yesum

Well-known member
ICMag Donor
Veteran
He got 1 thing right I will admit that. Wants to disarm us as well as turning us into a third world nation. Fuck. I have to go Republican cause the Dems are just idiots overall. See avatar.
 

oldchuck

Active member
Veteran
Bernie Sanders has the best sense of right and wrong of anyone prominent in politics today. Anyone objectively watching that bunch of Republican klutzes last night could tell the difference between ignorant bull shit and the real deal. Bernie doesn't really understand weed and is not too interested in it personally. Likewise he is not gay but avidly supports gay rights. He is the only reasonable alternative right now and he can win it.
 

krood

Active member
The problem i have is when the guys are running for office, they can say whatever they want to get votes. When they really get the position, i think they realize the weight of it all. Example was obama saying if he were to be elected president "every single person that wanted to dedicate their life to teaching will not pay a cent in college."
 

oldchuck

Active member
Veteran
I've known Bernie Sanders for 40 years, not as a personal friend but we have talked a few times, shared the same stage a couple of times, and I've had the pleasure of voting for him numerous times. He means exactly what he says and has never engaged in typical political bullshit. He ain't Jesus and I don't always agree with him but he is the best candidate for President out there.
 

Cannavore

Well-known member
Veteran
Now, if only he wasn't a communist in favor of further destroying our country with unchecked immigration. You can't have everything.

Wants to disarm us as well as turning us into a third world nation. Dems are just idiots overall. See avatar.


illK6U.gif
 

RetroGrow

Active member
Veteran
Bernie is a nice man. Unfortunately, he is deluded when it comes to his immigration policy. Not fixing the immigration cluster fuck is not an option. If it wasn't for that, I could almost support him. Just look at the results of public school testing in Detroit and other major metropolitan cities: 93% not proficient in reading, 96% not proficient in math. This is the result of affirmative action, and 50 years of Democratic control of the inner cities. The welfare state is an epic failure. Do we really want another Marxist in the White House? The current Marxist in chief is a fail of epic proportions. No, I'm not going to post an idiotic meme...that's for subliterate Facebook crowd.
 

bigAl25

Active member
Veteran
Bernie is the man. May have to send his campaign some money and vote for him in the primary next year. Peace and respect.
 
Bill Maher, who interviewed Sanders on HBO’s “Real Time”, pressed Sanders on the point.

“Now this has been studied, the amount of tax revenue we would get just from taxing the people who I think your fans think you’re talking about -- the people who own a yacht -- does not come close to covering what you want to pay for,” Maher argued.

“Not true, not true,” the Democratic presidential hopeful responded.

Sanders then went through the largest items on his policy agenda -- Medicare for all; free college tuition at public institutions; higher Social Security benefits; and free child care -- and explained how each of them would only require asking more of wealthy Americans.

But Sanders acknowledged that he might need to raise taxes on more than the top 1 percent of earners.

“We may have to go down a little bit lower than that, but not much lower,” Sanders said.

The top 1 percent is made up of 1.13 million households with average incomes of $2.1 million a year, according to the Tax Policy Center. The New York Times estimates that increasing those households’ total tax burden from roughly one-third today to 40 percent would raise an additional $157 billion in revenue per year.

To put that amount in perspective, the Times noted that Sanders’ plan to cover the cost of undergraduate tuition at a public college or university would cost the federal government $47 billion.

Sanders intends to pay for his college plan, however, by taxing financial transactions. He has introduced Social Security legislation that expands benefits and extends the program’s solvency by eliminating the cap on taxable earnings, which currently means millionaires only contribute to the program on the first $118,500 they earn.

The senator told Maher he would pay for child care by closing corporate tax loopholes.

The arithmetic on a single-payer health care system is a little bit trickier. Although Sanders has not yet released a detailed single-payer plan, a similar bill introduced by Rep. John Conyers (D-Mich.) would be financed in part by payroll taxes on middle-income and wealthy earners.

An analysis of the plan by Gerald Friedman, an economist at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst, projects that Conyers’ bill would reduce overall health care costs by $592 billion per year, ultimately saving consumers money.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/bernie-sanders-tax-the-rich_5622670ae4b0bce34700f168
 

Chunkypigs

passing the gas
Veteran
if the bills currently in congress pass and cannabis goes schedule 2 the current medical system stops. all schedule 2 meds come through pharmacies and must have FDA approval.

de-scheduling as Saunders proposes treats cannabis like tomatoes.

prices will fall when the USPS is no longer off limits for weed.
 

Latest posts

Latest posts

Top