What's new
  • ICMag and The Vault are running a NEW contest! You can check it here. Prizes are seeds & forum premium access. Come join in!

9th Court of appeal might overturn Fed Law soon

jump /injack

Member
Veteran
A Washington state couple has sued the DOJ, they want their arrest overturned, this could be the deciding case for Cannabis. If you haven't been writing to your CongressCritter, don't you think its time you started. This is a political and money game now such as in California, the Democrats fought for years [with some exceptions] for suppression because of taking money from the Guards Union and the legal profession, now the Democrats are trying to steal the Cannabis tax money for BS and not medical research. The money we are talking about is in the hundreds of millions, maybe billions. If this tax money goes to the State they will bust your balls for it because this is their play money.

Marijuana ruling in Washington State could limit federal prosecutions
Rolland Gregg
In this photo taken Tuesday, May 3, 2016, Rolland Gregg, right, and his fiance Sarah England pose for a photo at their home in Kirkland, Wash. Gregg and his family have fought federal marijuana charges for more than three years, arguing that the plants investigators found on their Washington property were for their own medicinal use and fully complied with state law. (AP Photo/Elaine Thompson)
Print Email
The Associated Press By The Associated Press
on May 08, 2016 at 4:51 PM

SAN FRANCISCO — Rolland Gregg and his family have fought federal marijuana charges for more than three years, arguing that the roughly 70 marijuana plants investigators found on their Washington property were for their own medicinal use and fully complied with state law.

A federal jury last year convicted Gregg, his mother and his wife of growing 50 to 100 marijuana plants — amounts their attorney said are in compliance with state medical marijuana law. With prison sentences looming, they have now turned to a recent act of Congress that they say should have stopped the U.S. Department of Justice from prosecuting them because they were doing what their state allowed. Marijuana is illegal under federal law, and the DOJ disagrees with Gregg's understanding of the new law.

Governor wants 'meaningful' medical marijuana bill

Governor wants 'meaningful' medical marijuana bill

The governor made his comments during a news conference ahead of the House floor debate on medical marijuana.

"It's been the hardest thing I've ever had to deal with in my life when you see the government coming down on you for simply trying to be healthy," Gregg said.

A federal appeals court is expected to issue a ruling soon on the scope of the law that could pave the way to end or overturn at least six federal marijuana criminal prosecutions and convictions in California and Washington, including Gregg's, and limit future prosecutions of medical marijuana users and dispensaries in eight Western states that allow them.

"The 9th Circuit is the biggest circuit, one that contains lots of marijuana states. If they were to say, 'The federal government is prohibited from enforcing medical marijuana law,' that would be huge," said Sam Kamin, a professor at the University of Denver Sturm College of Law who studies marijuana regulation.

At issue is a Congressional amendment that said the DOJ could not use funding Congress allocated to it for 2015 and 2016 to prevent states that have legalized medical marijuana from implementing laws that permit its use, distribution and possession.

The amendment's bipartisan sponsors — California Congressmen Sam Farr, D-Carmel, and Dana Rohrabacher, R-Costa Mesa,— say it prohibits the DOJ from prosecuting people who are complying with state medical marijuana laws. California and more than 20 other states have legalized marijuana for medical use. The drug, however, remains illegal under federal law.

The DOJ has interpreted the law more narrowly, saying it prevents prosecutors from trying to block state medical marijuana laws or charging state officials who implement them, yet permits U.S. attorneys to go after marijuana dispensaries and growers.

The 9th Circuit is expected to clarify the amendment in appeals by three sets of defendants who have cited it as grounds for judges to dismiss their marijuana charges.

Steve McIntosh, a dispensary owner in Los Angeles, had permits from local officials that show him in compliance with state law, according to his attorney, Marc Zilversmit. Under the Congressional amendment, the most the federal government can do is refer him to state authorities for prosecution, Zilversmit said.

Another defendant, marijuana grower Samuel Doyle, met Washington's requirements for collective cannabis grows for medical marijuana patients, his attorney Douglas Hiatt said.

"He was growing medical marijuana for people who needed it, whether they could afford it or not," Hiatt said.

The DOJ says McIntosh's dispensary had ties to a street gang, and Doyle and his co-defendants did not meet the legal requirements for medical marijuana in Washington. Investigators found more than 550 plants growing on the Spokane property Doyle oversaw, and at least one of Doyle's co-defendants indicated the marijuana was being sold, prosecutors said.

The DOJ did not respond to a request for further comment.

Gregg's case is not among the ones the 9th Circuit is set to rule on. But he has raised the same argument as the other defendants, and the 9th Circuit has put his appeal on hold pending the outcome of the other appeals, his attorney Phil Telfeyan said.

"The feds think they have the power to override voters of the State of Washington and the will of Congress," said Telfeyan, co-founder of the nonprofit civil rights group Equal Justice Under Law. "It's up to the 9th Circuit to tell them, 'Enough is enough. You can't keep prosecuting people who are using medical marijuana for their needs.'"

The DOJ cited a county investigator's testimony that he saw evidence of a for-profit marijuana growing operation on Gregg's family property. The investigator said he found records that he believed were for drug sales, a scale and packaging material in the house as well as firearms, according to court documents.

Gregg, 34, who owns an alternative energy company, denied he sold marijuana, saying he used the drug to treat pain following a snowboarding accident that left him with a broken back and neck. His mother has rheumatoid arthritis and his ex-wife had an eating disorder, he said, adding that all three had medical marijuana authorizations.

But the DOJ argued in his case and Doyle and McIntosh's cases that the Rohrabacher-Farr amendment doesn't bar it from prosecuting people violating federal drug law, even if they meet state law.

Watch mom's stirring testimony on medical marijuana [go to site below to see testimony]

The most sweeping medical marijuana bill to move through the legislature is now headed for a vote of the House of Representatives, where it faces a tough fight.

Alex Kreit, a marijuana law expert at Thomas Jefferson School of Law in San Diego, said the DOJ and marijuana defendants have strong arguments for their conflicting interpretations of the amendment.

"The (amendment's) language is not a model of clarity," he said. "It really is open to a number of different interpretations."

http://www.nola.com/politics/index.ssf/2016/05/marijuana_ruling_in_washington.html
 
Last edited:

MJPassion

Observer
ICMag Donor
Veteran
Eliminate the DEA
& all our troubles go away.
Legitimize the weed
to fill all our med/rec needs.
 
Eliminate the DEA
& all our troubles go away.
Legitimize the weed
to fill all our med/rec needs.



Not in Washington. We have the LCB to take DEA's place.


Make no mistake. LCB is a law enforcement agency. I have been through a few 502 store inspections and chatted up the LCB officers that were performing the inspection. They made it very clear that "Yes. We are cops here to enforce the law.".


And the new law says: "Thou shalt pay 37% excise tax on medicine".
 

stoned-trout

if it smells like fish
Veteran
I might win the lottery too...yeehaw....pay attention to Washington cause its a model cali will soon most likely follow
 
Top