SmokinErb22
Member
Not sure what the issue is. In theory, this should more than suffice.
Ambient temps ~ 60f +/-
Flower cabs(x2) - 4 x 4 x 6.5 = 104 cu ft (2) = 208 cu ft to be exhausted.
870 cfm exhaust. Assume 50% CFM lost with carbon filter = 435 CFM. And I doubt I'm actually losing 50%, less than 10ft duct runs.
435 cfm / 208 cu ft = 2x per minute air exchange.
2x 400w bulbs, stacked vert. 50w/sqft, to give an idea of bulb heat output.
The small utility chamber on top of my veg cab houses all of my fans and ballasts. It works on the vacuum it creates. I see all runs going to the utility chamber as intakes, so I doubled 'em up and ran two "exhausts" and two intakes to minimize drag - I have two 6" duct runs for each 6" exhaust fan as per the normal standard of 2:1 passive intake to exhaust ratio.
I imagine I have closer to 3x per minute air exchange, but regardless 2x is more than sufficient and is what DHF and many others constantly preach. 50w/sqft, 2x per min exhaust. This whole cab was designed around that very concept. I recently spent nearly $1k on adding a second light and fan, only to be shocked to see my temps rise to 112f, and then level off around 102-105. They actually got up to 125f while I was in the process of installing it and the face cover of the utility cab was off, thus no vacuum. This is way too hot and a pretty significant (~30f) jump in temps.
I'm not sure if its a design issue with my duct runs or what? Should I add a 3rd run from the vacuum to each flower cab? Should I seal one off?
Ambient temps ~ 60f +/-
Flower cabs(x2) - 4 x 4 x 6.5 = 104 cu ft (2) = 208 cu ft to be exhausted.
870 cfm exhaust. Assume 50% CFM lost with carbon filter = 435 CFM. And I doubt I'm actually losing 50%, less than 10ft duct runs.
435 cfm / 208 cu ft = 2x per minute air exchange.
2x 400w bulbs, stacked vert. 50w/sqft, to give an idea of bulb heat output.
The small utility chamber on top of my veg cab houses all of my fans and ballasts. It works on the vacuum it creates. I see all runs going to the utility chamber as intakes, so I doubled 'em up and ran two "exhausts" and two intakes to minimize drag - I have two 6" duct runs for each 6" exhaust fan as per the normal standard of 2:1 passive intake to exhaust ratio.
I imagine I have closer to 3x per minute air exchange, but regardless 2x is more than sufficient and is what DHF and many others constantly preach. 50w/sqft, 2x per min exhaust. This whole cab was designed around that very concept. I recently spent nearly $1k on adding a second light and fan, only to be shocked to see my temps rise to 112f, and then level off around 102-105. They actually got up to 125f while I was in the process of installing it and the face cover of the utility cab was off, thus no vacuum. This is way too hot and a pretty significant (~30f) jump in temps.
I'm not sure if its a design issue with my duct runs or what? Should I add a 3rd run from the vacuum to each flower cab? Should I seal one off?