What's new
  • As of today ICMag has his own Discord server. In this Discord server you can chat, talk with eachother, listen to music, share stories and pictures...and much more. Join now and let's grow together! Join ICMag Discord here! More details in this thread here: here.

Electronic ballasts and RF/cable interference, AGAIN

The new Lumatek's now in the market no longer need a shielded cord as internal changes were made to address the interference. So you will have nothing to worry about. The assembly line would have different models from different sellers, so there are alot of other digital ballasts that do still have that problem. Also, the 250 HPS is still in the silver case for a bit, but has all the changes that the other higher wattage models do. When the higher model cases were changed to blue, that is when they first adressed the issue of the interference. They state as to have changed the circuitry or something like that or another.
 
Last edited:

clowntown

Active member
Veteran
Slickster,

Thank you very much for the information. That restored my confidence a bit, at least until the ETA (Friday). I ordered it with an EYE Hortilux Super HPS bulb, but I've not heard any problems with these, I think it was just the Grolux and a few others (correct me if I'm wrong).

On the other hand I bought a Sylvania Grolux as well on eBay (under $30 shipped), before finding out about this problem. That bulb probably won't be here for another week or two, so we'll see.

Either way I'll definitely post the results and let you guys know. I will do some testing with my broadband Internet connection as well as an AM/FM radio, and post results on the bulbs as well.
 

mrgrowmez

Member
No Hastle?

No Hastle?

I just want to bring everyones
attention to this..............
:yoinks:

Is that meant to say "no hassle" or is hastle a word I just dont know?......
In any case, Any product with "no hastle" printed on it is just asking to be boycotted lol :pointlaug
Buyer beware
growmez :joint:
 

clowntown

Active member
Veteran
Yes they meant "hassle", just a double-reverse-compensated phonetic spelling that's somewhat common on Chinese-manufactured items (especially on the very limited amount of literature that ships with it).
 

clowntown

Active member
Veteran
cough_cough_eer said:
We are using the Lumatek 600 with a hotulux bulb, no problems !!!!
Which version/model/edition of the Lumatek's, and in what type of environment? How far from high-frequency sources such as digital cable, broadband Internet, VoIP, etc?
 

goalie

Member
i picked up a lumatek 600w digital ballast. It shuts down my DSL WITH the RF cord. Its worse then the one i bought without RF cable ...somehow...should i try adding a ferrite?
 

clowntown

Active member
Veteran
Which model did you get? The silver one with the built-in cord? Does it have any particular model number on it? Adding a ferrite core wouldn't hurt; let us know how it works. If you have access to some copper, try encasing the cord in some copper. There are some companies that sell RF shielding material online as well...

My "new model" Lumatek (detachable cordset; blue exterior; 600w/120v), which supposedly has this issue resolved has been delayed in shipping and isn't expected 'til next Thursday. When it arrives, I'll let you guys know how it handles my broadband cable Internet connection as well as a few other testing methods.
 
Last edited:

goalie

Member
yes its the silver one with built in cord. Model lumatek 600 says on the box.
i did not know they had a newer model


indeed let us know how it works compared to this one
 

clowntown

Active member
Veteran
This from Hu$tle Tree$ gave me a little bit more hope:

Hu$tle Tree$ said:
If you have the latest Lumatek ballast all should be well.....I had one of the earlier silver models before they corrected the issue. I think you can test it using an AM radio to see if its putting out any interference. I had a DSL internet connection through my phone line and my ballast completly interrupeted my signal, I also notice that it caused my tds meter to give false reading very weird stuff!! The new ballasts should be fine though just keep your eyes peeled for any funny stuff. Hope this helps!! Good Luck!!

H$T$
By the way, this is what the new Lumatek's look like. At least the 600's:

lumatek_ballast.jpg

a430_1.JPG

a478_1.JPG


I'm a bit confused by the cord plug on the last 2 pictures, because I thought they had proprietary Hydrofarm plugs like the first picture. Maybe the second two are knock-offs, or something? :chin:

Edit: I guess that's the power input side, with the same connector as a PC power supply?
 
Last edited:

goalie

Member
you would need an rf shielded input too i guess. You never know on the internet lots of knockoffs everywhere


Wow thats exactly what happened with mine as Hu$tle Tree$

do you have the link to the thread...was he able to fix his?
 

clowntown

Active member
Veteran
That particular message was via PM, but he talked about his problems with the Lumatek's somewhere... just don't remember what thread.

He "worked around" the issue by getting magnetic ballasts. :yoinks:
 

goalie

Member
i got a warranty card with mine says 5 year warranty from lumatek...maybe they'll give me a blue one instead lol
 

clowntown

Active member
Veteran
What does that warranty cover? Would causing RF interference be considered a defect, or does it perform as stated in being able to light a bulb?

Hope it's considered a defect or whatever that gets you a model that does not cause problems! I don't know anything about FCC regulations or any of that, and what standards manufacturers are required (if any) to meet, etc.
 
G

Guest

rf problems..

rf problems..

have 1 of the silver lumatek, the last 1s to come out, are they trouble too, too be honest not noticed any side effects from using it,ec pens good, ph pens good, internet connection seems to be good, when i bought it, shop claimed this be the new and improved version. so whats the crack, have been following the digital ballast threads, i know there were problems with them, is the 1 with rf shielded cord.(2 earths) other than the paranoia, tis the shit,
 
I just wanted to drop off my 2 cents cause this topic happens to be under my area of expertise.

When manufactures claim something is RF shielded, it means that most of the electrical components are cover with a high carbon content polymer (aka black plastic!). It's that simple. However, it's very difficult to shield all the RF emitting from the power cord connection, so usually no ballast is perfectly shielded.

There's an easy solution if you are having RF interference problems. Surround the area/room/cabinet that contains the ballast with a layer or two of black poly. Remember, black plastic absorbs RF like a sponge, where as metal reflects it like a mirror. Wet wood absorbs RF like a champ too but that's not as easy to work with as black poly.

~Cheers,
Stoney
 

stonewall

Active member
Plastics, by their very nature of being non-conductive, do not attenuate EMI/RFI.
Ideal RFI shield is a complete enclosure of all electronic components with a grounded, low resistance, conductive housing. Conductively coated plastics are available, but these tend to be of relatively high resistance and therefore not suitable for RFI shielding purposes. Regular black poly will not attenuate RFI to any degree.


http://www.kemcointernational.com/newcoatings.htm
 
Last edited:
Top