Ibechillin
Masochist Educator
I put together a detailed thread on lighting terminology/science and photosynthesis on 12/5. I highly recommend reading to clarify the science of it all between HPS/MH, Double Ended HPS, CMH and Led.
Watching Canna Cribs and Growing Exposed episodes on youtube, I realized many licensed producers are running led fixtures. Licensed Growers can get rebates on the led fixtures up to 90% off MSRP through their power company for using less than 1000w lights, yielding the same or even more with higher terps and potency! If a facility running hundreds of lights can confidently switch completely over and boast improvement, there has to be some truth to the claims I figured.
Here is the company that specializes in grow lighting rebates for licensed producers (lighting quotes are free)
https://growrebates.com/
Those videos are why I started researching Led heavily and made the lighting information thread. Black Dog LED, Fluence and California Lightworks together have extensive research and testing published on their sites (for cannabis specifically even). I put the thread together using information from all 3 and HID light spectrum comparisons from Growers House, all very credible sources (along with additional research of my own).
From Black Dog LED Site:
"Various artificial grow light technologies create different light spectrums. LED grow lights differ significantly from other forms of artificial plant lights in that the spectrum can be tuned, eliminating unwanted excesses of light wavelengths (colors) while providing light plants can use most efficiently. Other artificial lighting technologies produce much of their light as an unintended and unavoidable byproduct of how they operate, ultimately wasting energy in heating up plant leaves.
When a photon of light hits a plant leaf, it can either be reflected or absorbed. Reflected photons will not affect the leaf temperature at all, but physics dictates that all photons absorbed by the leaf will increase the leaf temperature; how much depends on the energy (wavelength) of the photon and whether or not some of that energy was used to trigger other chemical reactions, such as photosynthesis. Photons fully utilized by the plant in chemical reactions will heat the leaf less than photons which are absorbed but not utilized. Therefore, measuring leaf surface temperature indirectly measures the efficiency of the light spectrum for growing plants-- less-efficient spectrums will tend to heat the leaf more, while more-efficient spectrums will heat the leaf less as more of the light energy is being converted to chemical energy.
High Pressure Sodium (HPS) in particular converts a significant portion of the energy consumed by the light directly to non-visible infrared light in the 810-830nm range, peaking about 819nm. This infrared light is perceptible to you (and plants) by the warmth it creates when exposed to the light. Additionally, much of the visible light HPS bulbs produce is yellow and not highly-utilized by plants. This radiation not used for photosynthesis or other chemical reactions only serves to heat up the leaves, requiring cooler ambient temperatures to keep the plants' leaves at their ideal temperature."
Link To Leaf Surface Temperature Full Study (Other Plant Results Than Cannabis Also):
https://www.blackdogled.com/lst
HPS Lamps have an interior wall temperature around 752 degrees Fahrenheit (400 Celsius), CMH Ceramic arc tubes can operate at higher temperatures over 1700 degrees Fahrenheit (927.67 Celsius) so they can be potential fire hazards. Many city and county safety codes are beginning to prohibit the use of HID systems in residential indoor grows due to the dramatic increase in “closet fires”. Roughly 75% of all the energy consumed by an HID lamp is emitted as heat, and most of that heat is in the form of Infra-Red (IR) radiation. So not only do HID systems require significant air-conditioning, but the high levels of IR heat the leaves without raising the air temperature, and this differential can cause localized heat stress, fox-tailing, and other heat related problems even when the room air temperature is in a safe range, Optimal leaf surface temperature is around 88f for cannabis, which under hps occurs around 75f ambient room temperature.
Here is a comparison of leaf surface temps between 1000w HPS and 750w led both at 24" above canopy at 75f and 84F ambient room temperatures. All images below were taken with the FLIR camera's color scale locked between 69 °F and 95 °F to allow for easier direct comparisons. In this color scale, blue and cyan correspond to temperatures in the 70-79 °F range, green, yellow and orange represent the 80-89 °F range, and red-orange, red and white indicate temperatures in the 90+ °F range.
Led doesnt emit all of the unnecessary extra light spectrum that plants cant utilize. The leaf surface temp is much lower at 75f ambient room temperature because more of the light is available for growth. Being able to run the grow room at a warmer 84f temp can also save on AC if you live in a warm area.
Reproducing This Experiment Yourself:
Leaf surface temperature in otherwise-identical conditions can be greatly influenced by the thickness of leaves and their pigmentation level, which depend on the conditions an individual plant has been exposed to up to that point. Using the same exact plants for all conditions in the experiment eliminates the possibility of this natural variation affecting the results. (This would also suggest using near consistent lighting from seedling/clone to harvest for strongest establishment.)
Keep in mind that relative humidity affects how much evaporative cooling can cool the leaf, and that relative humidity is relative to the temperature. If you have 50% relative humidity in a 75 °F room and just heat the air up to 84 °F, the relative humidity will drop to 37%, and evaporative cooling will have a greater effect on leaf surface temperature.
As you can see from our FLIR pictures, leaf surface temperature can vary significantly even within one leaf. Using an infrared thermometer to measure leaf surface temperature will only give the temperature at a single point. A FLIR camera gives you a better picture (literally) of the full temperature range over the leaves.
Natural Sunlight Spectrum:
Plants evolved over millions of years to best convert light energy into carbohydrates and sugars. The most readily available light from the sun is in the middle part of the spectrum which we see as green, yellow and orange. These are the primary frequencies that human eyes use. However, studies show that these are the least used light frequencies in plants. Most of the photosynthetic activity is in the blue and red frequencies. The main reason for this counter-intuitive use of light by plants seems to be related to early forms of bacteria and the evolution of photosynthesis. Photosynthesis first evolved in bacteria over millions of years in the primordial sea. This evolved in bacteria long before the appearance of more complex leafy plants. These early photosynthetic bacteria extensively used the yellow, green and orange middle spectrums for photosynthesis which tended to filter out these light spectrums for plants evolving at lower levels in the ocean. As more complex plants evolved they were left only with the spectrums not used by bacteria, mostly in the red and blue frequencies.
There are two forms of Chlorophyll, each has absorption peaks in both the red and blue spectrums and both reflect yellow and green giving plants their green color. Chlorophyll A is the primary photosynthetic pigment and most abundant, it has absorption peaks at 430nm blue and 662nm red. Chlorophyll B is an accessory pigment and has absorption peaks at 453nm blue and 642nm red.
Many manufacturers reference the absorption spectrum of chlorophyll A and B (shown next) which peak in the blue and red regions of the visible spectrum as the main reason for providing a purple spectrum.
^The action spectrum of photosynthesis was created from research that was performed in the 1970s by Drs. McCree and Inada and this work was fundamental in defining the range of photosynthetically active radiation (PAR). Prior to this research, very little work had been performed to determine how varying wavelengths of light influenced photosynthesis and plant growth. These researchers utilized filters to create monochromatic wavebands to determine the influence of light spectra on photosynthesis of single leaves using an assimilation chamber.
So why is there such a difference between the absorption spectrum and the action spectrum if chlorophyll is responsible for photosynthesis?
Recent work has shown that green light does promote photosynthesis in chlorophylls, quite efficiently in fact. Green light is able to penetrate deeper into leaf surfaces to drive photosynthesis in chloroplast located towards the bottom surface of the leaf, even more efficiently than red light at high PPFD. As PPFD increases, light energy that is absorbed in the upper chloroplasts tends to be dissipated as heat, while penetrating green light increases photosynthesis by exciting chloroplasts located deep in the mesophyll (Terashima et. al., 2009). Additionally, green light penetrates through leaf surfaces much better than red or blue light to reach the lower canopy, which is extremely important in dense canopy production techniques which are common in controlled environment agriculture.
Chlorophylls Are Not The Only Photoreceptors That Are Responsible For Photosynthesis!
There are other types of antenna photoreceptors which also utilize this spectrum range to promote photosynthesis, mainly the carotenoids. The carotenoid family consists of smaller families of pigments called carotenes and xanthophylls, The difference between the two groups is chemical: carotenes are hydrocarbons and do not contain oxygen, while xanthophylls contain oxygen. The two absorb different wavelengths of light during a plant’s photosynthesis process, carotenes are orange and xanthophylls are more yellow.
Carotenes contribute to photosynthesis by transmitting the light energy they absorb to chlorophyll. Carotene protects plant cells against the destructive effects of ultraviolet light and also has an important antioxidant function of deactivating free radicals — single oxygen atoms that can damage cells by reacting with other molecules. They also help to absorb the energy from singlet oxygen, an excited form of the oxygen molecule O2 which is formed during photosynthesis.
Xanthophylls are both accessory pigments and structural elements of light-harvesting complexes (Lhcs). Together with β-carotene, they act both as chromophores, absorbing light energy that is used in photosynthetic electron transport, and as photoprotectants of the photosynthetic apparatus from excess light and from the reactive oxygen species (ROS) that are generated during oxygenic photosynthesis.
So while the green/orange/yellow bands can be absorbed by other pigments like the Carotenoids, they are far less efficient. Over 50% of this spectrum range is reflected away and/or poorly utilized. Carotenoids are typically located deeper in the leaf because they get most of their photons from light that is reflected off the leaves and bounces deeper into the canopy to be absorbed through the bottom of the leaves.
Bulb Life Expectancy In different Lighting Systems:
Veg light running 16 hours per day = 5840 hours per year.
Bloom light running 12 hours per day = 4360 hours per year.
As time on goes on the spectrum of the bulbs becomes less optimal and they produce less total light. HPS bulbs are typically recommended to be replaced after ~9-12 months of 12 on 12 off flowering light cycle use (3285-4360 hrs). MH bulbs are typically recommended replaced after ~9 months of use In 16 on 8 off Vegetative Growth light cycle (4380 hrs).
CMH with stronger arc tubes and a square wave ballast are advertised to resist thermal breakdown better and last longer before needing replacement. Many Led lights are advertised to last ~50,000 hrs of use before light output degrades a similar amount to HPS or MH after the recommended replacement time.
Watching Canna Cribs and Growing Exposed episodes on youtube, I realized many licensed producers are running led fixtures. Licensed Growers can get rebates on the led fixtures up to 90% off MSRP through their power company for using less than 1000w lights, yielding the same or even more with higher terps and potency! If a facility running hundreds of lights can confidently switch completely over and boast improvement, there has to be some truth to the claims I figured.
Here is the company that specializes in grow lighting rebates for licensed producers (lighting quotes are free)
https://growrebates.com/
Those videos are why I started researching Led heavily and made the lighting information thread. Black Dog LED, Fluence and California Lightworks together have extensive research and testing published on their sites (for cannabis specifically even). I put the thread together using information from all 3 and HID light spectrum comparisons from Growers House, all very credible sources (along with additional research of my own).
From Black Dog LED Site:
"Various artificial grow light technologies create different light spectrums. LED grow lights differ significantly from other forms of artificial plant lights in that the spectrum can be tuned, eliminating unwanted excesses of light wavelengths (colors) while providing light plants can use most efficiently. Other artificial lighting technologies produce much of their light as an unintended and unavoidable byproduct of how they operate, ultimately wasting energy in heating up plant leaves.
When a photon of light hits a plant leaf, it can either be reflected or absorbed. Reflected photons will not affect the leaf temperature at all, but physics dictates that all photons absorbed by the leaf will increase the leaf temperature; how much depends on the energy (wavelength) of the photon and whether or not some of that energy was used to trigger other chemical reactions, such as photosynthesis. Photons fully utilized by the plant in chemical reactions will heat the leaf less than photons which are absorbed but not utilized. Therefore, measuring leaf surface temperature indirectly measures the efficiency of the light spectrum for growing plants-- less-efficient spectrums will tend to heat the leaf more, while more-efficient spectrums will heat the leaf less as more of the light energy is being converted to chemical energy.
High Pressure Sodium (HPS) in particular converts a significant portion of the energy consumed by the light directly to non-visible infrared light in the 810-830nm range, peaking about 819nm. This infrared light is perceptible to you (and plants) by the warmth it creates when exposed to the light. Additionally, much of the visible light HPS bulbs produce is yellow and not highly-utilized by plants. This radiation not used for photosynthesis or other chemical reactions only serves to heat up the leaves, requiring cooler ambient temperatures to keep the plants' leaves at their ideal temperature."
Link To Leaf Surface Temperature Full Study (Other Plant Results Than Cannabis Also):
https://www.blackdogled.com/lst
HPS Lamps have an interior wall temperature around 752 degrees Fahrenheit (400 Celsius), CMH Ceramic arc tubes can operate at higher temperatures over 1700 degrees Fahrenheit (927.67 Celsius) so they can be potential fire hazards. Many city and county safety codes are beginning to prohibit the use of HID systems in residential indoor grows due to the dramatic increase in “closet fires”. Roughly 75% of all the energy consumed by an HID lamp is emitted as heat, and most of that heat is in the form of Infra-Red (IR) radiation. So not only do HID systems require significant air-conditioning, but the high levels of IR heat the leaves without raising the air temperature, and this differential can cause localized heat stress, fox-tailing, and other heat related problems even when the room air temperature is in a safe range, Optimal leaf surface temperature is around 88f for cannabis, which under hps occurs around 75f ambient room temperature.
Here is a comparison of leaf surface temps between 1000w HPS and 750w led both at 24" above canopy at 75f and 84F ambient room temperatures. All images below were taken with the FLIR camera's color scale locked between 69 °F and 95 °F to allow for easier direct comparisons. In this color scale, blue and cyan correspond to temperatures in the 70-79 °F range, green, yellow and orange represent the 80-89 °F range, and red-orange, red and white indicate temperatures in the 90+ °F range.
Led doesnt emit all of the unnecessary extra light spectrum that plants cant utilize. The leaf surface temp is much lower at 75f ambient room temperature because more of the light is available for growth. Being able to run the grow room at a warmer 84f temp can also save on AC if you live in a warm area.
Reproducing This Experiment Yourself:
Leaf surface temperature in otherwise-identical conditions can be greatly influenced by the thickness of leaves and their pigmentation level, which depend on the conditions an individual plant has been exposed to up to that point. Using the same exact plants for all conditions in the experiment eliminates the possibility of this natural variation affecting the results. (This would also suggest using near consistent lighting from seedling/clone to harvest for strongest establishment.)
Keep in mind that relative humidity affects how much evaporative cooling can cool the leaf, and that relative humidity is relative to the temperature. If you have 50% relative humidity in a 75 °F room and just heat the air up to 84 °F, the relative humidity will drop to 37%, and evaporative cooling will have a greater effect on leaf surface temperature.
As you can see from our FLIR pictures, leaf surface temperature can vary significantly even within one leaf. Using an infrared thermometer to measure leaf surface temperature will only give the temperature at a single point. A FLIR camera gives you a better picture (literally) of the full temperature range over the leaves.
Natural Sunlight Spectrum:
Plants evolved over millions of years to best convert light energy into carbohydrates and sugars. The most readily available light from the sun is in the middle part of the spectrum which we see as green, yellow and orange. These are the primary frequencies that human eyes use. However, studies show that these are the least used light frequencies in plants. Most of the photosynthetic activity is in the blue and red frequencies. The main reason for this counter-intuitive use of light by plants seems to be related to early forms of bacteria and the evolution of photosynthesis. Photosynthesis first evolved in bacteria over millions of years in the primordial sea. This evolved in bacteria long before the appearance of more complex leafy plants. These early photosynthetic bacteria extensively used the yellow, green and orange middle spectrums for photosynthesis which tended to filter out these light spectrums for plants evolving at lower levels in the ocean. As more complex plants evolved they were left only with the spectrums not used by bacteria, mostly in the red and blue frequencies.
There are two forms of Chlorophyll, each has absorption peaks in both the red and blue spectrums and both reflect yellow and green giving plants their green color. Chlorophyll A is the primary photosynthetic pigment and most abundant, it has absorption peaks at 430nm blue and 662nm red. Chlorophyll B is an accessory pigment and has absorption peaks at 453nm blue and 642nm red.
Many manufacturers reference the absorption spectrum of chlorophyll A and B (shown next) which peak in the blue and red regions of the visible spectrum as the main reason for providing a purple spectrum.
^The action spectrum of photosynthesis was created from research that was performed in the 1970s by Drs. McCree and Inada and this work was fundamental in defining the range of photosynthetically active radiation (PAR). Prior to this research, very little work had been performed to determine how varying wavelengths of light influenced photosynthesis and plant growth. These researchers utilized filters to create monochromatic wavebands to determine the influence of light spectra on photosynthesis of single leaves using an assimilation chamber.
So why is there such a difference between the absorption spectrum and the action spectrum if chlorophyll is responsible for photosynthesis?
Recent work has shown that green light does promote photosynthesis in chlorophylls, quite efficiently in fact. Green light is able to penetrate deeper into leaf surfaces to drive photosynthesis in chloroplast located towards the bottom surface of the leaf, even more efficiently than red light at high PPFD. As PPFD increases, light energy that is absorbed in the upper chloroplasts tends to be dissipated as heat, while penetrating green light increases photosynthesis by exciting chloroplasts located deep in the mesophyll (Terashima et. al., 2009). Additionally, green light penetrates through leaf surfaces much better than red or blue light to reach the lower canopy, which is extremely important in dense canopy production techniques which are common in controlled environment agriculture.
Chlorophylls Are Not The Only Photoreceptors That Are Responsible For Photosynthesis!
There are other types of antenna photoreceptors which also utilize this spectrum range to promote photosynthesis, mainly the carotenoids. The carotenoid family consists of smaller families of pigments called carotenes and xanthophylls, The difference between the two groups is chemical: carotenes are hydrocarbons and do not contain oxygen, while xanthophylls contain oxygen. The two absorb different wavelengths of light during a plant’s photosynthesis process, carotenes are orange and xanthophylls are more yellow.
Carotenes contribute to photosynthesis by transmitting the light energy they absorb to chlorophyll. Carotene protects plant cells against the destructive effects of ultraviolet light and also has an important antioxidant function of deactivating free radicals — single oxygen atoms that can damage cells by reacting with other molecules. They also help to absorb the energy from singlet oxygen, an excited form of the oxygen molecule O2 which is formed during photosynthesis.
Xanthophylls are both accessory pigments and structural elements of light-harvesting complexes (Lhcs). Together with β-carotene, they act both as chromophores, absorbing light energy that is used in photosynthetic electron transport, and as photoprotectants of the photosynthetic apparatus from excess light and from the reactive oxygen species (ROS) that are generated during oxygenic photosynthesis.
So while the green/orange/yellow bands can be absorbed by other pigments like the Carotenoids, they are far less efficient. Over 50% of this spectrum range is reflected away and/or poorly utilized. Carotenoids are typically located deeper in the leaf because they get most of their photons from light that is reflected off the leaves and bounces deeper into the canopy to be absorbed through the bottom of the leaves.
Bulb Life Expectancy In different Lighting Systems:
Veg light running 16 hours per day = 5840 hours per year.
Bloom light running 12 hours per day = 4360 hours per year.
As time on goes on the spectrum of the bulbs becomes less optimal and they produce less total light. HPS bulbs are typically recommended to be replaced after ~9-12 months of 12 on 12 off flowering light cycle use (3285-4360 hrs). MH bulbs are typically recommended replaced after ~9 months of use In 16 on 8 off Vegetative Growth light cycle (4380 hrs).
CMH with stronger arc tubes and a square wave ballast are advertised to resist thermal breakdown better and last longer before needing replacement. Many Led lights are advertised to last ~50,000 hrs of use before light output degrades a similar amount to HPS or MH after the recommended replacement time.
Last edited: