As you know, sometimes less is more. Of course, that may not be in the spirit of this forum, but...
I am not a cannabis fan, but rather a cannabis researcher. One of the problems wich concerned me, was the correct dose for a real homeostatic working regime of the endocannabinoid system.
Now, we all know that THC is mimicking the anandamide (sort of), so there is the perception that ingesting/smoking it will do the same thing.
We also know that CBD is breaking down some enzymes wich are responsible for breaking down anandamide, but we also know now that this is not the only effect of CBD (5-ht receptors being a potential target for it).
One thing wich seems not to be perceived, is (if it would be to speak about this, because they are many other neurotransmiters wich are involved in homeostatic functions) that anandamide concentration in the body is usually very low. I will try to find some numbers these days in this directions.
Because of this, working in those two ways for a "regulation" of the endocannabinoid system (I mean THC in one way, or CBD in the other), we should normally keep in mind that we should employ those substances in a manner wich would preserve the same functionality of the endocannabinoid system (if it was lost in a direction: upregulation or downregulation).
A new trend in cannabis use (one for wich I tried a little to find information on the forum), is microdosing.
It makes me very attentive, because of my preocupation, and even if the idea of "microdosing" wich is trendy right now is not what I mean, it is still "less is more" in its approach.
Being very sensitive, and basically a nonuser of cannabis , it was easier for me to perceive some effects, even at small doses (if a small joint - 100mg - is a low dose, hehe...). I tried CBD, THC/CBD, THC. All the times, the results seemed to be the same: what I felt was like the endocannabinoid system was overflown.
Basically, all regulation systems in nature, for a smooth action, needs to work in a linear region (one for each system, of course). Upregulating or downregulating them, put them out of their normal function.
Using THC/CBD at "normal doses", from 1 mg and up to tens or a couple of hundreds, will make the endocannabinoid system out of its normal functioning range.
Now, if we would have a pain, or some disease, we would be anyway "out of range", there is not a discusion here.
Anyway, when in a good shape (or almost), we may be interested in keeping our "functioning" state this way. We would need then a good homeostasy.
Here, I would say, it is the place of real microdosing.
Coming back with a new post tomorrow.
L.E Yes, I know that microdosing is bad for the industry, but this is nothing I can do about it...
I am not a cannabis fan, but rather a cannabis researcher. One of the problems wich concerned me, was the correct dose for a real homeostatic working regime of the endocannabinoid system.
Now, we all know that THC is mimicking the anandamide (sort of), so there is the perception that ingesting/smoking it will do the same thing.
We also know that CBD is breaking down some enzymes wich are responsible for breaking down anandamide, but we also know now that this is not the only effect of CBD (5-ht receptors being a potential target for it).
One thing wich seems not to be perceived, is (if it would be to speak about this, because they are many other neurotransmiters wich are involved in homeostatic functions) that anandamide concentration in the body is usually very low. I will try to find some numbers these days in this directions.
Because of this, working in those two ways for a "regulation" of the endocannabinoid system (I mean THC in one way, or CBD in the other), we should normally keep in mind that we should employ those substances in a manner wich would preserve the same functionality of the endocannabinoid system (if it was lost in a direction: upregulation or downregulation).
A new trend in cannabis use (one for wich I tried a little to find information on the forum), is microdosing.
It makes me very attentive, because of my preocupation, and even if the idea of "microdosing" wich is trendy right now is not what I mean, it is still "less is more" in its approach.
Being very sensitive, and basically a nonuser of cannabis , it was easier for me to perceive some effects, even at small doses (if a small joint - 100mg - is a low dose, hehe...). I tried CBD, THC/CBD, THC. All the times, the results seemed to be the same: what I felt was like the endocannabinoid system was overflown.
Basically, all regulation systems in nature, for a smooth action, needs to work in a linear region (one for each system, of course). Upregulating or downregulating them, put them out of their normal function.
Using THC/CBD at "normal doses", from 1 mg and up to tens or a couple of hundreds, will make the endocannabinoid system out of its normal functioning range.
Now, if we would have a pain, or some disease, we would be anyway "out of range", there is not a discusion here.
Anyway, when in a good shape (or almost), we may be interested in keeping our "functioning" state this way. We would need then a good homeostasy.
Here, I would say, it is the place of real microdosing.
Coming back with a new post tomorrow.
L.E Yes, I know that microdosing is bad for the industry, but this is nothing I can do about it...