ATTN: WareHouse Growers In The East Bay, Cali....

MadBuddhaAbuser said:

Noone belongs in jail for weed ever.

But what do you guys expect when you keep it illegal to maximize profits?

Click to expand...

MadBuddhaAbuser said:

Noone belongs in jail for weed ever.

But what do you guys expect when you keep it illegal to maximize profits?

Click to expand...

You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to krunchbubble again.

Click to expand...

Norkali said:

Might not hurt to mention that the DEA just ran the fuck through Vallejo, CA a couple days ago too - city a little north of the 'east bay' - they apparently shut down all of the dispensaries and seized plenty of records. The article says just that club, but other reports say that all clubs in the city are now closed as well.

Link - Feds Lead Joint Raid on Vallejo Dispensary

btw, FUCK that shit.

Click to expand...

krunchbubble said:

Just came back from my boys warehouse that just got busted...

Apparently, Alameda County Sheriffs now have a "ROOF JUMP TEAM"...

They go on warehouse rooftops, at night, to look for exhaust systems, exhausting at night....

They are also now checking warehouse against business licences! if you have a warehouse and no business licence, it is a red flag to check it out for a grow, sending in the "ROOF JUMP TEAM"....

The Sheriffs said that they don't really care about grows under 500 plants, there looking for sales, money, stealing power and guns...

im hoping this WILL save a few warehouse and a few of us ICMAGGERS from getting busted....

Click to expand...

blueberrydrumz said:

i must admit i have no idea what ron paul will do for the MJ user..
(i dont live in the us) but i just read in your avatar that he will legalize it? i wouldnt buy that... could just be a plot to get all the stoners to vote... and theres alot in the us, lets say 5% of the population, that could give him a edge against other candidates...
but whot do i know..
peace

Click to expand...

krunchbubble said:

these fucking people again......

Click to expand...

MadBuddhaAbuser said:

Oh I forgot, you prefer these people.

We both know you'd be feeling much different if your case went federal.

Click to expand...

krunchbubble said:

Just came back from my boys warehouse that just got busted...

Apparently, Alameda County Sheriffs now have a "ROOF JUMP TEAM"...

They go on warehouse rooftops, at night, to look for exhaust systems, exhausting at night....

They are also now checking warehouse against business licences! if you have a warehouse and no business licence, it is a red flag to check it out for a grow, sending in the "ROOF JUMP TEAM"....

The Sheriffs said that they don't really care about grows under 500 plants, there looking for sales, money, stealing power and guns...

im hoping this WILL save a few warehouse and a few of us ICMAGGERS from getting busted....

Click to expand...

The curtilage is an important legal term to define the land immediately surrounding a house or dwelling, including any closely associated buildings and structures, but excluding any associated 'open fields beyond'. It defines the boundary within which a home owner can have a reasonable expectation of privacy and where 'intimate home activities' take place. It is an important legal concept in some jurisdictions for the understanding of burglary, trespass, and in relation to planning controls.
In urban properties the location of the curtilage may be evident from the position of fences, wall and similar; within larger properties it may be a matter of some legal debate as to where the private area ends and the 'open fields' start.

Curtilage in United States law

This distinction is important in United States law for cases dealing with burglary and with self-defense under the "Castle Doctrine." In some state law, such as Florida, burglary encompasses the English common law definition and adds (among other things) curtilage to the protected area of the dwelling into which intrusion is prohibited. Similarly, under Florida's Castle Doctrine a home-owner does not have to retreat within the curtilage.
The boundary between the home and the curtilage that surrounds it, on the one hand, and the open fields beyond the curtilage, on the other, is also important for the application of the prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The warrant requirement of the Fourth Amendment applies only to the "home," which courts have construed to include the area immediately surrounding the house in which the intimate home activities occur, but not to the open fields beyond. The requirement that law enforcement officers obtain a warrant before searching a suspect's home extends, therefore, to the curtilage, but not to private property beyond the curtilage, even if their access to such "open fields" without the owner's permission would constitute a trespass. [2]
In United States v. Dunn, the Supreme Court identified four factors as critical when assessing the limits of curtilage: "the proximity of the area claimed to be curtilage to the home, whether the area is included within an enclosure surrounding the home, the nature of the uses to which the area is put, and the steps taken by the resident to protect the area from observation by people passing by."

Click to expand...