What's new
  • ICMag with help from Landrace Warden and The Vault is running a NEW contest in November! You can check it here. Prizes are seeds & forum premium access. Come join in!

MARIJUANA PROHIBITION FACTS (2005)

I.M. Boggled

Certified Bloomin' Idiot
Veteran
Source: Marijuana Policy Project

Very few Americans had even heard about marijuana when it was first federally prohibited in 1937.
Today, between 95 and 100 million Americans admit to having tried it.

According to government-funded researchers, high school seniors consistently report that marijuana is easily available, despite decades of a nationwide drug war. With little variation, every year about 85% consider marijuana “fairly easy” or “very easy” to obtain.
Data from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention show that more U.S. high school students currently smoke marijuana, which is completely unregulated, than smoke cigarettes, which are sold by regulated businesses.

There have been over seven million marijuana arrests in the United States since 1993, including 755,186 arrests in 2003—an all-time record.
One person is arrested for marijuana every 42 seconds.
About 88% of all marijuana arrests are for possession—not manufacture or distribution.

Every comprehensive, objective government commission that has examined the marijuana phenomenon throughout the past 100 years has recommended that adults should not be criminalized for using marijuana.

Cultivation of even one marijuana plant is a federal felony.

Lengthy mandatory minimum sentences apply to myriad offenses.
For example, a person must serve a five-year mandatory minimum sentence if federally convicted of cultivating 100 marijuana plants—including seedlings or bug-infested, sickly plants.
This is longer than the average sentences for auto theft and manslaughter.

A one-year minimum prison sentence is mandated for “distributing” or “manufacturing” controlled substances within 1,000 feet of any school, university, or playground. Most areas in a city fall within these “drug-free zones.” An adult who lives three blocks from a university is subject to a one-year mandatory minimum sentence for selling an ounce of marijuana to another adult—or even growing one marijuana plant in his or her basement.

Approximately 77,000 marijuana offenders are in prison or jail right now.

A recent study of prisons in four Midwestern states found that approximately one in ten male inmates reported that that they had been raped while in prison.
Rates of rape and sexual assault against women prisoners, who are most likely to be abused by male staff members, have been reported to be as high as 27 percent in some institutions.

Civil forfeiture laws allow police to seize the money and property of suspected marijuana offenders—charges need not even be filed.
The claim is against the property, not the defendant.
The owner must then prove that the property is “innocent.”
Enforcement abuses stemming from forfeiture laws abound.

MPP estimates that the war on marijuana consumers costs taxpayers nearly $12 billion annually.

Many patients and their doctors find marijuana a useful medicine as part of the treatment for AIDS, cancer, glaucoma, multiple sclerosis, and other ailments.
Yet the federal government allows only seven patients in the United States to use marijuana as a medicine, through a program now closed to new applicants.
Federal laws treat all other patients currently using medical marijuana as criminals.
Doctors are presently allowed to prescribe cocaine and morphine—but not marijuana.

Organizations that have endorsed medical access to marijuana include: the AIDS Action Council, American Academy of Family Physicians, American Public Health Association, American Academy of HIV Medicine, American Nurses Association, Lymphoma Foundation of America, National Association of People With AIDS, the New England Journal of Medicine, the state medical associations of New York, California, Florida and Rhode Island, and many others.

A few of the many editorial boards that have endorsed medical access to marijuana include: Boston Globe, Chicago Tribune, Miami Herald, New York Times, Orange County Register, USA Today, Baltimore’s Sun, and The Los Angeles Times.

Since 1996, a majority of voters in Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, the District of Columbia, Maine, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, and Washington state have voted in favor of ballot initiatives to remove criminal penalties for seriously ill people who grow or possess medical marijuana.

Seventy-two percent of Americans believe that marijuana users should not be jailed. Eighty percent support legal access to medical marijuana for seriously ill adults.

“Decriminalization” involves the removal of criminal penalties for possession of marijuana for personal use.
Small fines may be issued (somewhat similarly to traffic tickets), but there is typically no arrest, incarceration, or criminal record.
Marijuana is presently decriminalized in 11 states—California, Colorado, Maine, Minnesota, Mississippi, Nebraska, Nevada, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, and Oregon.
In these states, cultivation and distribution remain criminal offenses.

Decriminalization saves a tremendous amount in enforcement costs.
California saves $100 million per year.

A 2001 National Research Council study sponsored by the U.S. government found “little apparent relationship between the severity of sanctions prescribed for drug use and prevalence or frequency of use, and ... perceived legal risk explains very little in the variance of individual drug use.”
The primary evidence cited came from comparisons between states that have and have not decriminalized marijuana.

In the Netherlands, where adult possession and purchase of small amounts of marijuana are allowed under a regulated system, the rate of marijuana use by teenagers is far lower than in the U.S.
Under a regulated system, licensed merchants have an incentive to check ID and avoid selling to minors. Such a system also separates marijuana from the trade in hard drugs such as cocaine and heroin.

“Zero tolerance” policies against “drugged driving” can result in “DUI” convictions of drivers who are not intoxicated at all.
Trace amounts of THC metabolites—detected by commonly used tests—can linger in blood and urine for weeks after any psychoactive effects have worn off.
This is equivalent to convicting someone of “drunk driving” weeks after he or she drank one beer.

The arbitrary criminalization of tens of millions of Americans who consume marijuana results in a large-scale lack of respect for the law and the entire criminal justice system.

Marijuana prohibition subjects users to added health hazards:

• Adulterants, contaminants, and impurities—Marijuana purchased through criminal markets is not subject to the same quality control standards as are legal consumer goods. Illicit marijuana may be adulterated with much more damaging substances; contaminated with pesticides, herbicides, or fertilizers; and/or infected with molds, fungi, or bacteria.

• Inhalation of hot smoke—One well-established hazard of marijuana consumption is the fact that smoke from burning plant material is bad for the respiratory system. Laws that prohibit the sale or possession of paraphernalia make it difficult to obtain and use devices such as vaporizers, which can reduce these risks.

Because vigorous enforcement of the marijuana laws forces the toughest, most dangerous criminals to take over marijuana trafficking, prohibition links marijuana sales to violence, predatory crime, and terrorism.

Prohibition invites corruption within the criminal justice system by giving officials easy, tempting opportunities to accept bribes, steal and sell marijuana, and plant evidence on innocent people.

Because marijuana is typically used in private, trampling the Bill of Rights is a routine part of marijuana law enforcement—e.g., use of drug dogs, urine tests, phone taps, government informants, curbside garbage searches, military helicopters, and infrared heat detectors.

Marijuana Policy Project
http://www.mpp.org/prohfact.html
 
Last edited:

I.M. Boggled

Certified Bloomin' Idiot
Veteran
"The Economics Of Drug Prohibition And Drug Legalization"

"This paper does not attempt to make the case for or against prohibition or legalization; likewise, it does not claim to be a complete or systematic evaluation of the evidence.
The goal has been to show how the legal status of drugs affects the market for drugs and to demonstrate that many outcomes commonly attributed to drugs are instead due to drug prohibition.

http://www.icmag.com/ic/showthread.php?t=16944
...........................................................................................................

"Medical Marijuana Briefing" on the need to change state and federal Laws..2005...

http://www.icmag.com/ic/showthread.php?t=16095
 
Last edited:

Ferre

Member
Parker, L. A. (2003) Papers (pdf)
"The Discriminatory Origins of the American Drug Wars, The Creation of the Drug Criminalization Industry, And The Effect On Modern Fourth Amendment Law: Using Luhmannian Concepts to Determine The Historical Origins & Effects of Social Phenomena."
Paper Presented at Copenhagen Business School, Center For Corporate Communication, Copenhagen, Denmark, May 25, 2003.
By Lori Ann Parker, M.C.J.

Agency of FEAR - Origins of the Drug Enforcement Agency (pdf)
Opiates and Political Power in America. The Story of How the Drug Enforcement Administration Came to Be.
By Edward Jay Epstein
 
G

Guest

I am printing this shit out and putting it next to my stash incase anyone in my residence finds my starsh.
 

I.M. Boggled

Certified Bloomin' Idiot
Veteran
'War on Drugs:' A Foul Tragedy
opinion/editorial
By Garrison Keillor

[Garrison Keillor is the host and writer of "A Prairie Home Companion," now in its 26th year on the air. http://prairiehome.publicradio.org/ ]
A marijuana grower can get life in prison without parole, while a murderer might be in for eight years.
No rational person can defend this...

"We Democrats are at our worst when we try to emulate Republicans -- as we did in signing onto the "war" on drugs that has ruined so many young lives.

The cruelty of the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984 is stark indeed, as are the sentencing guidelines that impose mandatory minimum sentences for minor drug possession -- guidelines in the 1986 Anti-Drug Abuse Act that sailed through Congress without benefit of public hearings, drafted before an election by Democrats afraid to be labeled "soft on drugs."

As a result, a marijuana grower can land in prison for life without parole while a murderer might be in for eight years.
No rational person can defend this; it is a Dostoevskian nightmare, and it exists only because politicians fled in the face of danger.

That includes Bill Clinton, under whose administration the prosecution of Americans for marijuana went up hugely, so that now there are more folks in prison for marijuana than for violent crimes.
More than for manslaughter or rape. This only makes sense in the fantasy world of Washington, where perception counts for more than reality. To an old Democrat, who takes a ground view of politics -- What is the actual effect of this action on the lives of real people? -- it is a foul tragedy that makes you feel guilty about enjoying your freedom.

If suddenly on a Friday night the red lights flash and the cops yank your teenage son and his little envelope of marijuana into the legal meatgrinder and some bullet-headed prosecutor decides to flex his muscle and charge your teenager -- because he had a .22 rifle in his upstairs bedroom closet -- with a felony involving the use of a firearm, which under our brutal sentencing code means he can be put on ice for 20 years, and the prosecutor goes at him hammer and tong and convinces a passive jury and your boy's life is sacrificed so this creep can run for Congress next year -- this is not your cross alone to bear. If the state cuts off your right hand with a meat cleaver on my account and I don't object, then it is my cleaver and my fingerprints on it.

I don't dare visit Sandstone Federal Prison here in Minnesota for fear of what I'd see there: People who chose marijuana, a more benign drug than alcohol, and got caught in the religious war that we Democrats in a weak moment signed onto.
God help us if we form alliance with such bullies as would destroy a kid's life for raising cannabis plants.

G.K.



Original source:.Posted December 6, 2005, "In These Times".
http://www.alternet.org/drugreporter/29113/
 
G

Guest

In 3 years, we will have a new president. In 10 years, most of these fogeys controlling our contry will be dead.

Some of the attrocities that Dick Cheeney have been involved in make me question why hes not in jail let alone the VP.
 

I.M. Boggled

Certified Bloomin' Idiot
Veteran
A nation founded on pot

A nation founded on pot

By K.Holzmueller
Rants, Raves & Reflections
http://fp.uni.edu/northia/article2.asp?ID=4403&SECTION=2


A nation founded on pot


It goes along with being born and raised in any given society that you internalize that culture’s value and belief system.

As a child, I was taught a number of things that I never questioned at the time, one of them being that marijuana and other illegal drugs are bad — period. “Just say no” were the brainwashing buzzwords hailed by my teachers back in the days of D.A.R.E.

I believed them at the time. Lately, I’m not so sure.

In fact, after having done an extensive amount of reading on the topic of marijuana, I’m at a complete loss as to why it is so heavily stigmatized (and criminalized) in our society.

There is evidence to suggest that since the beginning of civilization, humans have cultivated the plant cannabis sativa. It thrives in a multitude of climates, spreads easily (yep, weed is a weed), grows to great heights and has many uses.

Common names for cannabis today include marijuana, pot, dope, hashish, reefer and the ever-so-clever “wacky weed.” Cannabis’s stalk — hemp — contains fibers that can be used for a multitude of purposes. It is its flowering buds and leaves that contain the potent ingredient THC which people get high from.

Our own nation’s history with marijuana began with our forefathers. George Washington, Benjamin Franklin and Thomas Jefferson all grew hemp on their farmland. Washington reportedly stated, “Make the most of the hemp seed. Sow it everywhere.” The first law concerning marijuana in the American colonies required all farmers to grow hemp.

Not only has marijuana been around basically since the human race started settling down and farming to sustain itself, the use of mind-altering substances has been found in other species.

In a book entitled “Exuberance: The Passion for Life,” author Kay R. Jamison comments on how other species are commonly found to be in search of a good time. Gorillas, wild boars, porcupines and spider monkeys have all been found partaking of intoxicating or hallucinogenic berries, fungi, grains and insects.

Those who are against the legalization of marijuana (read: political groups who gain from its prohibition) often perpetuate pot’s detrimental effects on the human body.

It is true that smoking weed can cause damage; short-term memory deficiencies in heavy smokers are common and can sometimes endure long after smoking stops. Smoking marijuana heavily can be likened to the effects of smoking tobacco heavily. It can lead to chronic bronchitis, cellular impairment and eventual cancers of the mouth, throat and lungs.

However, on studies conducted of lifelong heavy smokers in Jamaica, Greece and Costa Rica, little psychological or physiological damage was found. And because the active ingredient in marijuana, THC, isn’t toxic at high levels, and because it delivers its high almost immediately, repeated doses of weed are rarely necessary. Thus, smokers of the drug inhale fewer toxins than smokers of tobacco, resulting in a decrease in lung problems.

In addition, “It’s impossible to take a lethal overdose” of pot, according to Miles Herkenham, a brain researcher at the National Institute of Health in Bethesda, Md.

Take a look at some of the latest statistics concerning annual causes of death in the U.S.:

Tobacco: 430,700

Adverse reactions to prescription drugs: 32,000

Alcohol: 110,640

Anti-inflammatory drugs such as aspirin: 7,600

Marijuana: 0

Judging by those numbers, it’s safe to say that the risks of “tokin’ up a joint” pale in comparison to smoking cigarettes, drinking alcohol, or the usage of both prescription and non-prescription drugs.

As this is my opinion, and my column, I believe it’s relevant to add that I’m not writing this because I myself choose to smoke pot. (Although I have in my lifetime made a pilgrimage to the Mecca of all potheads, the sweet-smelling city of Amsterdam.)

It’s a personal choice; I’d rather do other things to achieve a positive state of mind. Like, for instance, pay a hefty fee to go hurl myself down a mountain with two skis strapped to my feet, or go twist my body into funny-looking contortions in yoga class.

But I don’t look badly upon people who make the choice—albeit an illegal one—to smoke weed for recreational purposes.

Marijuana, compared to so many other things our society frequently indulges in, is safe. It’s one of the many things that people do to alter their brain states and get them to start feeling good. It’s been around for a long time, it isn’t going anywhere, other species partake of similar activities, it poses few health risks and there are no reports of anyone ever dying as a direct result from smoking it.

I just wish that this society would stop looking down upon it and start focusing on more important things.
 
Last edited:

PureSativa420

Active member
nice read boggled, funny how the the stuff that is legal to use such as tobacco, alcohol and other things kill people but the simple plant of marijuana doesnt

maybe the government wants us to kill are selves and make big money at the sametime
 

Fat Albert

Active member
Anybody who would like to read more about the co-evolutionary role of mind-altering substances and humans should read "The Natural Mind" by Andrew Weil, M.D. Most of you may recognize him as the health guy with the HUGE bushy white beard. While he was at Harvard, though, he wrote this book. He isn't enamored with the idea of repeatedly inhaling smoke, but he acknowledges the safety and efficacy of marijuana with regard to its ability to relieve various physical and mental symptoms. A great read!

Fat A
 

I.M. Boggled

Certified Bloomin' Idiot
Veteran
2006 update document:

2006 update document:

Cannabis Prohibition Facts 2006

Source: Marijuana Policy Project (M.P.P.)
http://www.mpp.org/

1. Very few Americans had even heard about marijuana when it was first federally prohibited in 1937. Today, between 95 and 100 million Americans admit to having tried it, and about 14.5 million say they use it at least monthly. 1,2

2. According to government-funded researchers, high school seniors consistently report that marijuana is easily available, despite decades of a nationwide drug war. With little variation, every year about 85% consider marijuana “fairly easy” or “very easy” to obtain. 3 Data from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention show that more U.S. high school students currently smoke marijuana, which is completely unregulated, than smoke cigarettes, which are sold by regulated businesses. 4

3. There have been over seven million marijuana arrests in the United States since 1995, including 771,605 arrests in 2004—more than for all violent crimes combined, and an all-time record. One person is arrested for marijuana every 41 seconds. About 89% of all marijuana arrests are for possession—not manufacture or distribution. 5

4. Every comprehensive, objective government commission that has examined the marijuana phenomenon throughout the past 100 years has recommended that adults should not be criminalized for using marijuana. 6

5. Cultivation of even one marijuana plant is a federal felony.

6. Lengthy mandatory minimum sentences apply to myriad offenses. For example, a person must serve a five-year mandatory minimum sentence if federally convicted of cultivating 100 marijuana plants—including seedlings or bug-infested, sickly plants. This is longer than the average sentences for auto theft and manslaughter! 7

7. A one-year minimum prison sentence is mandated for “distributing” or “manufacturing” controlled substances within 1,000 feet of any school, university, or playground. Most areas in a city fall within these “drug-free zones.” An adult who lives three blocks from a university is subject to a one-year mandatory minimum sentence for selling an ounce of marijuana to another adult—or even growing one marijuana plant in his or her basement. 8

8. While exact figures are unavailable, conservative estimates indicate that between 32,500 and 40,000 Americans are in prison or jail on marijuana charges right now—more than the entire prison populations of eight individual European Union countries combined. 9

9. A recent study of prisons in four Midwestern states found that approximately one in ten male inmates reported that they had been raped while in prison. 10 Rates of rape and sexual assault against women prisoners, who are most likely to be abused by male staff members, have been reported to be as high as 27 percent in some institutions. 11

10. Civil forfeiture laws allow police to seize the money and property of suspected marijuana offenders—charges need not even be filed. The claim is against the property, not the defendant. The owner must then prove that the property is “innocent.” Enforcement abuses stemming from forfeiture laws abound. 12

11. According to estimates by Harvard University economist Jeffrey Miron, replacing marijuana prohibition with a system of taxation and regulation would save between $10 billion and $14 billion per year in reduced government spending and increased tax revenues. 13

12. Many patients and their doctors find marijuana a useful medicine as part of the treatment for AIDS, cancer, glaucoma, multiple sclerosis, and other ailments. Yet the federal government allows only seven patients in the United States to use marijuana as a medicine, through a program now closed to new applicants. Federal laws treat all other patients currently using medical marijuana as criminals. Doctors are presently allowed to prescribe cocaine and morphine—but not marijuana. 14,15

13. Organizations that have endorsed medical access to marijuana include: the AIDS Action Council, American Academy of Family Physicians, American Public Health Association, American Academy of HIV Medicine, American Nurses Association, Lymphoma Foundation of America, National Association of People With AIDS, the state medical associations of New York, California, and Rhode Island, and many others.

14. A few of the many editorial boards that have endorsed medical access to marijuana include: Boston Globe, Chicago Tribune, Miami Herald, New York Times, Orange County Register, USA Today, Baltimore’s Sun, and The Los Angeles Times.

15. Since 1996, a majority of voters in Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, the District of Columbia, Maine, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, and Washington state have voted in favor of ballot initiatives to remove criminal penalties for seriously ill people who grow or possess medical marijuana.

16. Fifty-five percent of Americans believe possession of small amounts of marijuana should not be treated as a criminal offense. Seventy-eight percent support “making marijuana legally available for doctors to prescribe in order to reduce pain and suffering.” 16

17. “Decriminalization” involves the removal of criminal penalties for possession of marijuana for personal use. Small fines may be issued (somewhat similarly to traffic tickets), but there is typically no arrest, incarceration, or criminal record. Marijuana is presently decriminalized in 11 states—California, Colorado, Maine, Minnesota, Mississippi, Nebraska, Nevada, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, and Oregon. In these states, cultivation and distribution remain criminal offenses.

18. Decriminalization saves a tremendous amount in enforcement costs. California saves $100 million per year. 17

19. A 2001 National Research Council study sponsored by the U.S. government found “little apparent relationship between the severity of sanctions prescribed for drug use and prevalence or frequency of use, and ... perceived legal risk explains very little in the variance of individual drug use.” The primary evidence cited came from comparisons between states that have and have not decriminalized marijuana. 18

20. In the Netherlands, where adult possession and purchase of small amounts of marijuana are allowed under a regulated system, the rate of marijuana use by teenagers is far lower than in the U.S. 3,19 Under a regulated system, licensed merchants have an incentive to check ID and avoid selling to minors. Such a system also separates marijuana from the trade in hard drugs such as cocaine and heroin.

21. “Zero tolerance” policies against “drugged driving” can result in “DUI” convictions of drivers who are not intoxicated at all. Trace amounts of THC metabolites—detected by commonly used tests—can linger in blood and urine for weeks after any psychoactive effects have worn off. This is equivalent to convicting someone of “drunk driving” weeks after he or she drank one beer. 20

22. The arbitrary criminalization of tens of millions of Americans who consume marijuana results in a large-scale lack of respect for the law and the entire criminal justice system. Marijuana prohibition subjects users to added health hazards:

* Adulterants, contaminants, and impurities—Marijuana purchased through criminal markets is not subject to the same quality control standards as are legal consumer goods. Illicit marijuana may be adulterated with much more damaging substances; contaminated with pesticides, herbicides, or fertilizers; and/or infected with molds, fungi, or bacteria.
* Inhalation of hot smoke—One well-established hazard of marijuana consumption is the fact that smoke from burning plant material is bad for the respiratory system. Laws that prohibit the sale or possession of paraphernalia make it difficult to obtain and use devices such as vaporizers, which can reduce these risks. 21

23. Because vigorous enforcement of the marijuana laws forces the toughest, most dangerous criminals to take over marijuana trafficking, prohibition links marijuana sales to violence, predatory crime, and terrorism.

24. Prohibition invites corruption within the criminal justice system by giving officials easy, tempting opportunities to accept bribes, steal and sell marijuana, and plant evidence on innocent people.

25. Because marijuana is typically used in private, trampling the Bill of Rights is a routine part of marijuana law enforcement—e.g., use of drug dogs, urine tests, phone taps, government informants, curbside garbage searches, military helicopters, and infrared heat detectors.

NOTES

1. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Administration, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2004, Table H.1.
2. Time/CNN poll of adults, Time, Nov. 4, 2002. Forty-seven percent said they had tried marijuana at least once.
3. Johnston, L. D., O’Malley, P. M., Bachman, J. G. & Schulenberg, J. E. (December 19, 2005). Teen drug use down but progress halts among youngest teens (2005 Monitoring the Future survey results). University of Michigan News and Information Services: Ann Arbor, MI.
4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance -- United States, 2003, May 21, 2004, MMWR 2004:3(No. SS-2), tables 20 and 28.
5. Federal Bureau of Investigation, Uniform Crime Reports, Crime in the United States, annually.
6. For example, Report of the Indian Hemp Drugs Commission, 1894; The Panama Canal Zone Military Investigations, 1925; The Marihuana Problem in the City of New York (LaGuardia Committee Report), 1944; Marihuana: A Signal of Misunderstanding (Nixon-Shafer Report), 1972; An Analysis of Marijuana Policy (National Academy of Sciences), 1982; Cannabis, Our Position for a Canadian Public Policy (Report of the Senate Special Committee on Illegal Drugs), 2002, and others.
7. 21USC841(b)(1)(B); 1996 Sourcebook of Federal Sentencing Guidelines, U.S. Sentencing Commission, 1997; p. 24.
8. 21USC860(a); report from Congressional Research Service, June 22, 1995.
9. Zeidenberg, Jason and Colburn, Jason. Efficacy & Impact: The Criminal Justice Response to Marijuana Policy in the U.S., Justice Policy Institute, August 25, 2005
10. Struckman-Johnson, Cindy, and Struckman-Johnson, David, Sexual Coercion Rates in Seven Midwestern Prisons for Men, The Prison Journal, December 2000, pp. 379-90.
11. Struckman-Johnson, Cindy, and Struckman-Johnson, David, “Summary of Sexual Coercion Data,” for the conference “Not Part of the Penalty: Ending Prisoner Rape,” Oct. 19, 2001.
12. U.S. Rep. Henry Hyde (R–IL), Forfeiting Our Property Rights: Is Your Property Safe From Seizure? Cato Institute, 1995.
13. Miron, Jeffrey L., The Budgetary Implications of Marijuana Prohibition, June 2005.
14. Grinspoon, Lester, M.D., and Bakalar B., J.D., “Marijuana as Medicine: A Plea for Reconsideration,” Journal of the American Medical Association, June 21, 1995.
15. Marijuana Policy Project, Medical Marijuana Briefing Paper, 2006.
16. National Gallup poll, Nov. 1, 2005.
17. Aldrich, Michael, Ph.D., and Mikuriya, Tod, M.D., “Savings in California Marijuana Law Enforcement Costs Attributable to the Moscone Act of 1976—A Summary,” Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, Vol. 20(1), Jan.–March 1988; pp. 75-81.
18. National Research Council, Informing America’s Policy on Illegal Drugs: What We Don’t Know Keeps Hurting Us, National Academy Press, 2001; pp. 192-93.
19. Nationale Drug Monitor, Annual Report NDM 2004, Trimbos Institute, 2005.
20. Swann, P., “The Real Risk of Being Killed When Driving Whilst Impaired by Cannabis,” Australian Studies of Cannabis and Accident Risk, 2000.
21. Mirken, Bruce, “Vaporizers for Medical Marijuana,” AIDS Treatment News, Issue #327, September 17, 1999.
 
Top