Hiddenjems
Well-known member
I’m not in favor of the action, but non citizens can legally be deported for almost anything.the same could easily be said about the current POTUS... let's deport HIS ass !
I’m not in favor of the action, but non citizens can legally be deported for almost anything.the same could easily be said about the current POTUS... let's deport HIS ass !
Don't like being wrong I see.
By signing up, I agree to receive emails from The Intercept and to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.![]()
Pentagon Keeps Pouring Cash Into Golf Courses — Even As Trump Slashes Government Spending
The Pentagon owns 145 golf courses. As Trump cuts key government services, we found its plan to spend on sand traps and clubhouses.theintercept.com
Just as it is in America, if one wishes to live radically differently than the normies. (psst @Hempy McNoodle )My mother used to think she liked socialism. I would always ask her “what about regular people that don’t want to adopt socialism?”. The answer is men with guns kill you and take your stuff, how nice.
I get their emails with links to articles. I don't recall actually subscribing.By signing up, I agree to receive emails from The Intercept and to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
I could not read the article without signing up.I get their emails with links to articles. I don't recall actually subscribing.
Were you concerned with the Privacy Policy/ or was there another issue?By signing up, I agree to receive emails from The Intercept and to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Sorry to see that.I could not read the article without signing up.
I’m sure you are referring to j6 ,I believe that is falsethe same could easily be said about the current POTUS... let's deport HIS ass !
There are incidents (on video) in which Trump told his rally attendees to punch protestors in the face. Verbatim.I’m sure you are referring to j6 ,I believe that is false
That’s a lot of words to describe having a job…Thanks for being opposed to slavery!
Slavery or near slavery is a good reason to disavow BOTH crony capitalism and Communism. Both have removal of individual consent as features of how they operate, where a free-market interaction is based in individual consent.
It's theoretically possible to have 3 people all working on the same kind of job and one is a Commie, one is a crony capitalist laborer and one is a free market person.
The Commie, by virtue of being a Commie, won't have his consent being respected. Somebody assigned that person to that job. The individual has little say there.
The Crony capitalist laborer, won't have his consent respected either and is under threat to comply with government regulations etc. The individual won't have much say there.
The person the farthest from being a slave, is the free market person who negotiated and made a free choice to be there and is trading their labor or service without being compelled or under duress or owing a share to external parasites.
Tell this to the folks with beards and tits wearing a pink borat outfit.Just as it is in America, if one wishes to live radically differently than the normies. (psst @Hempy McNoodle )
"Only the best people."Robert Morris, former Texas megachurch pastor and Trump adviser, indicted for child sex crimes
Morris is a former spiritual adviser to President Donald Trump, and Gateway — one of the nation’s largest megachurches — has been particularly active in Dallas-area GOP politics.https://www.texastribune.org/2025/03/12/robert-morris-texas-megachurch-indicted-sexual-abuse/
![]()
Yeah but you suggested that revoking section 230 would stop platform owners from censoring speech when in fact it would actually increase the need to censor speech because trust me, no platform owner will set themselves up to be sued for content someone else posted on their platform. The reason for Trump to threaten to revoke it is because if they're still censoring speech when they're being protected from being held accountable, then they don't need that protection. Sure it is something Trump has threatened and been threatening since even before he was inaugerated. However it is still your arguement because you brought it up here to argue why platform owners won't do it in the future even if they have the right to do it, which you acknowledged is their right to do.first, it’s not my argument. It’s just something Trump is threatening ……….." “Times are not changing not in favor of freedom of speech anyway. It's only changing as far as what vspeech is promoted thru algorhytims and what speech is blocked thru Shadow Banning.” That is called censorship the opposite of free speech
Yeah I know what you were responding to, you didn't like the last part saying they can't "say what they want to say, in whatever way they want to say it, wherever they want to say it.” My point is that it's not an absolute right, it's a right that only applies to the government, as in the government can't stop you from saying what you want on government or public prroperty. When it comes to private property though, th owner does have the right to stop you because you don't have that free speech right on their private property. I mean come on, that's not that difficult a concept to grasp. Although I think you grasp the comcept just fine, your problem is being unable to admit when you're wrong.You lost me with this response ,I was responding to your statement “while people do have the right to free speech they do not have the right to say what they want to say, in whatever way they want to say it, wherever they want to say it.”
Then please explain to me why you're still debating a minor point I tried to clarify for you that originated from an entirely different point someone else made to you several pages back?Im not pretending or dense ,we’ll just let that one go