International Cannagraphic Magazine Click to buy Reservoir Seeds  

International Cannagraphic Magazine > News >
  Save the Pot Dealers! - Time magazine...
Register Forum Menu Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Search Today's Posts Social Groups

Latest Videos
Visit Seed Boutique for all your Genetic Needs
ICMag Front Page News « Previous | Next » You Rated this Thread:
Old 11-07-2009, 07:44 PM  
21387
FreedomFGHTR FreedomFGHTR is online now
President California Cannabis Inc.
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 967
Save the Pot Dealers! - Time magazine...

I've been trying to explain to people that weed is legal in California already and we don't need any of this tax and regulate bullshit. Seems that mainstream media publications also seems to agree with me on this.
Quote:
Originally Posted by http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1934996,00.html

Save the Pot Dealers!

By Joel Stein

Some dude outside my supermarket just asked me to sign a petition to legalize marijuana. Apparently he was so high that he forgot he's in California, where pot is already more legal than budget-balancing. Last year I was granted a medical-marijuana license, even though I'm healthy and I don't smoke weed. I went to a doctor's office that consisted of a desk, a TV, two cans of air freshener and a man wearing a Hawaiian T-shirt. I told Dr. Magnum P.I. about my constant anxiety, insomnia and headaches--two more conditions than any previous patient had bothered to mention. He freaked out and gave me a pot license for only six months until I saw a psychologist. My lovely wife Cassandra, however, got a full year's prescription by claiming she was afflicted with a condition called "menstruation." Looking back, I'm pretty sure I could have used that too.
There are more medical-marijuana dispensaries in L.A. than Starbucks. Most are like nice tea shops, where salespeople behind a counter open glass jars so you can smell the Sugar Kush, look at the Purple Urkel under a magnifying lens and ask about the effects of Hindu Skunk. At the Farmacy, I spun a wheel to determine my first-time-buyer gift and was handed a pot lollipop. If the pot-dispensary people ran General Motors, the recession would be over. Although GM cars would be engineered to just stare idly at the road for hours. Which is more than they're good for now.
The vast majority of that Sugar Kush is still in our house, mostly because Cassandra found an even more effective solution to menstruation called pregnancy. But also because shopping for pot in California is more fun than using it. So when Attorney General Eric Holder declared that the Federal Government would quit busting dispensaries, removing even the hint of consequences for medical-marijuana use, my heart ached for small-time American pot dealers. They can't compete on price, selection, customer service, quality control or not-getting-arrestedness, and they have no skills that translate into another industry. They're almost as bad off as journalists.
Of all the potheads I know--did I mention I live in Los Angeles?--only one still uses a dealer. He hasn't made the logical switch from purchasing illegal drugs to committing medical fraud partly because he doesn't want his name on a dispensary list for professional reasons, partly out of loyalty to his dealer and partly because to motivate a stoner, the invisible hand of capitalism first has to endure a long, boring conversation about how cool it would be to have an invisible hand.
But competition, it turns out, improves capitalism, even among the members of society least capable of doing math. "The dispensaries have really made my drug dealer step up," my friend told me. Not only is the dealer now charging $100 for a quarter ounce, compared with the $120 he'd charged for decades, but he has also started offering home delivery instead of shady parking-lot meetings. "He got more reliable. He used to be, 'Yeah, I can't do it today. Maybe tomorrow.' Sometimes you'd page him, and he'd never call you back. Now I'm like, 'I'm going to be at my house at 4 p.m.,' and he's like, 'I'll be there.'"
Still, the dime baggers don't stand a chance. So it is the Federal Government's responsibility to help with some sort of bailout. They need seed money. They need a WPA's worth of pastry chefs to make pot brownies. They need Snoop Dogg to pass on his genes to even more children. They need to get the 3-D version of Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs on DVD right away.
The drug warriors were right that medical marijuana would lead to pro forma legalization. But they were wrong about every other consequence, like the coming wave of donations from pot dealers to the next presidential candidate willing to criminalize medical marijuana. Also, legitimizing pot hasn't created more users; it has just produced more annoying ones, who now apply Whole Foods--ian levels of snobbiness to the differences between Hawaiian Sativa and Humboldt Indica.
As always, federal decisions have lots of unintended consequences, and many of them are good. As dispensaries wipe out pot dealers, teen drug use will fall dramatically. Instead of buying pot from a dealer, teenagers will have to struggle with the same imperfect methods they use to get alcohol: begging older siblings, stealing from their parents and waiting outside a dispensary until they find a guy creepy enough to accept a $20 bribe.
The bad part is that without any business to do, the last remaining pot dealers will now have absolutely no reason to stop talking and leave your apartment.

 


Content
New Article   Reply

Old 11-07-2009, 09:22 PM
Skip Skip is offline
Webslave

Join Date: 01-20-2004
Posts: 1466
Time magazine has been running a series of good stories on marijuana lately!
Old 11-07-2009, 09:26 PM
Ms_Weekend Ms_Weekend is online now
& Mr Weekend

Join Date: 04-07-2008
Location: COOL
Posts: 254
Funny & very TRUE!
Old 11-07-2009, 09:51 PM
THE GENERAL THE GENERAL is offline
New Member

Join Date: 09-25-2009
Posts: 28
very true, way to capture it ..
Old 11-07-2009, 10:17 PM
DIGITALHIPPY DIGITALHIPPY is offline
Senior Member

Join Date: 05-27-2007
Posts: 3683
hahaha funny stuff, except, gm vehicle is way better then they make it seam.
Old 11-07-2009, 10:21 PM
statusquo statusquo is offline
Member

Join Date: 10-16-2006
Posts: 186
"They can't compete on price, selection, customer service, quality control or not-getting-arrestedness, and they have no skills that translate into another industry."

"Of all the potheads I know--did I mention I live in Los Angeles?--only one still uses a dealer"

First quote seems right in regards to not-getting-arrestedness and selection but many dealers are able to offer all of those other things - sometimes better than a collective. Many collectives are ran by dealers that are uneducated regarding their product and how to conduct good business. As for quality control....are you kidding me? Many collectives implement systems that make it appear that they control for quality but I have yet to see too many good systems out there but I'm sure they do exist...

As for the second quote...I have yet to hear of a place where you couldn't get the same quality much cheaper from a "dealer" (you could both be legal patients mind you - just no collective involved). Granted some people don't have access to this and benefit from a storefront and that's fine...more power to them.
Old 11-07-2009, 10:27 PM
Skip Skip is offline
Webslave

Join Date: 01-20-2004
Posts: 1466
Best thing is to get it right from a grower, not a dealer. That's basically what the Collective system is meant to do.

Dealers are just middlemen who make $$$ from you. I suppose they shield the growers from strangers, but it's OK to be a small time grower and sell to others. Just form a collective and you're in.

Dealers just need to find another job. At the counter of a dispensary might work. It won't pay for the bling though...
Old 11-07-2009, 11:38 PM
!!! !!! is offline
Now in technicolor

Join Date: 09-17-2009
Location: Sinatra wrote a song about it
Posts: 224
The smart pot dealer will be saving money and working on a long term plan. But most will just go on to the next best thing. Other drugs, or perhaps electronic fraud? I wonder what criminals would do if the drug black market didn't exist. It's been too long.
Old 11-07-2009, 11:55 PM
Haps Haps is online now
stone fool

Join Date: 02-02-2006
Posts: 3619
When I quit dealing about 1980, I went into hot tub and waterbed sales, then management, heavy equipment service sales, computer sales, and finally became a marketing executive. Being a dealer was good sales training.
H
Old 11-08-2009, 04:43 AM
Blue Dot Blue Dot is offline
400 watts to Freedom

Join Date: 01-08-2009
Location: small minded POS border town
Posts: 1282
I'm confused. A lot of dispensary operators were previous drug dealers.
It's not like they faded away, they just do the same thing yet call it "compassion".

I mean who exactly does this author think became dispensary operators?
Old 11-08-2009, 05:15 AM
kmk420kali kmk420kali is offline
Freedom Fighter

Join Date: 03-19-2006
Location: So Cal
Posts: 2309
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blue Dot View Post
I'm confused. A lot of dispensary operators were previous drug dealers.
It's not like they faded away, they just do the same thing yet call it "compassion".

I mean who exactly does this author think became dispensary operators?
Yeah...I would hate to think that a guy who always worked on my cars for free...would become a legitimate Mechanic!!
Old 11-08-2009, 08:26 AM
NorCalFor20 NorCalFor20 is offline
Smokes, lets go

Join Date: 03-17-2008
Location: Sunnyvale Trailer Park, Southern California
Posts: 1808
haha there's blue dot i think we should call him red dot cuz hes always on the rag
Old 11-08-2009, 09:00 AM
Totah Sam Totah Sam is offline
naakaii dine'é

Join Date: 01-25-2008
Posts: 69
What chaps my ass is how these articles continue to refer to marijuana users as "potheads" and "stoners." The American public has been brainwashed into viewing these descriptions in a very negative way, thanks to the Government. It doesn't matter if the article is pro or anti legalization they all tend to use the same terminology.

So what if people choose to partake in the recreational use of marijuana? There's no need for negative stereotypes.

From now on anyone who likes to drink, I will refer to as alcoholics. It doesn't matter if they have one drink or five. I'm going to call them alcoholics. Turn about is fair play?
Old 11-08-2009, 09:17 AM
RollmeoneKenobi RollmeoneKenobi is offline
Member

Join Date: 08-07-2009
Posts: 227
Old 11-08-2009, 02:54 PM
j6p j6p is online now
Member

Join Date: 05-01-2009
Location: Tierra del Fuego
Posts: 241
Quote:
Originally Posted by Totah Sam View Post
What chaps my ass is how these articles continue to refer to marijuana users as "potheads" and "stoners."
Yep - such terms imply abuse and are used way too often. Perpetuating negative stereotypes indeed.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

IC Mag Home > News
All times are GMT +2. The time now is 02:47 AM.


This site is for educational and entertainment purposes only.
You must be of legal age to view ICmag and participate here.
All postings are the responsibility of their authors.
Portal By vbPortal Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, vbPortal. All Rights Reserved.